Maths P32 GT and paper discussion

[unkidd]

i couldnt do the the first part of the iteration question but did the rest. will i get any marks

 

[I don't care]

I actually found the paper in medium difficulty.... Alot of people in my center said it was tough with 1 or 2 exceptions saying easy .... Actually in reality it was tough so KEEP CALM AND PRAY FOR LOW GT

 

[SalmanPakRocks]

Please don't reveal the paper content before 24 hours. Paper was tough, but not as hard as that of June 2013. It was do-able.

 

[saadgujjar]

Please don't reveal the paper content before 24 hours. Paper was tough, but not as hard as that of June 2013. It was do-able.

expected gt

 

[shezi1995]

Did so many people find the polynomial question hard? I think it was easy as it used the previous result as it is. Overall the paper was okay I think. it was easier than the winter 2013 paper.

 

[SalmanPakRocks]

Did so many people find the polynomial question hard? I think it was easy as it used the previous result as it is. Overall the paper was okay I think. it was easier than the winter 2013 paper.

Yup, it was easier than winter 13 and june 13.
Expected GT would be around 55 to 60

 

[salvatore]

I've left questions worth around 20 marks
Do you think there's a chance of getting at least a B, if the mistakes I have made are minimal?

 

[A star]

Yup, it was easier than winter 13 and june 13.
Expected GT would be around 55 to 60

not in my opinion though many people including me are lossing around 15 - 20 marks so GT must be in the neighborhood of 55. I think it was almost as hard as the june one. I was able to complete the june var 32 and get 60 marks. but this was another level. it was not like k any relieving questions sab pharo ... so i think it will drop to a good 52-53

 

[salvatore]

I just noticed.. its stated in the poll that the lowest threshold achieved is 50 - 55. But the October/November 2013 paper had a threshold of 47, so hopefully it's gonna be the same this time

 

[Muhammad Arham Ayaz Malik]

Gt wont be above 50! It was as hard as oct 13 paper so it will be in neighbourhood of 47

 

[salvatore]

Gt wont be above 50! It was as hard as oct 13 paper so it will be in neighbourhood of 47

Amen!

 

[shafayat]

I found complex part ii to be a bit hard and the polynomial ii was kinda hard aswell tho it was easy for a few.

same here

 

[shafayat]

GT cannot be less than 53..
even if it was hard .. people wrote something ..
and everyone is going to get some marks in all question ! (except for me -_- I left 15 marks blank)

 

[A star]

GT cannot be less than 53..
even if it was hard .. people wrote something ..
and everyone is going to get some marks in all question ! (except for me -_- I left 15 marks blank)

dude there are many others like you . I too got flustered

 

[raysonzaffar]

dude there are many others like you . I too got flustered

1 thing sure that it has to be below 60 or maybe 55. It was a bit hard to be honest and a few questions were tricky aswell.

 

[Anstasia]

It was such a bad paper. 2014 papers are so bad. The grade thresh. Should go very low for maths i swear

 

[hope4thebest]

Yup, it was easier than winter 13 and june 13.
Expected GT would be around 55 to 60

Not easier than May/June 13 I suppose

 

[yuyu_373]

Sucked. Messed up differential and last part of vectors even though I knew it all just because of time.

yess last part in vectors i couldnt solve it too and the perimeter part too

 

[yuyu_373]

some questions were really tough and in almost every question i had to skip a part and tbh it was the most difficult paper i have ever solved it was even more diff. than nov 13!

 

[SomeStudent]

I know. I left that perimeter part coz I had run out of time.
I did solve the last part of vectors, just misread a coordinate.. :-/
Anyway, it was kind of tough and lengthy which made it worse!