Pakistan Studies, Islamiyat and Urdu: Post your doubts here!

[brainswipe]

hey, no dyng! our teacher used that book too, that why i use it. Why do you say its wrong? (asking so i can stop my friends aswell!)

STOP YOUR FRIENDS TOO!!!! I SWEAR TO GOD U NEED TO UNDERSTAND THE ANSWER PATTERN FAST AS YOU CAN!!

 

[ElLa_Jan]

I THINK you need to work a lot dude!!!! YOU still haven't understand ed the 14 mark answer pattern correctly!!
to make you understand write to me the most easiest question of HISTORY may it be 7 mark or 14 marks!!!

like i just said (or maybe u werent reading) i was only giving the points in it, which are almost the same as yours if u check.. i wasnt mentioning ant pattern or structure or order of points!

 

[brainswipe]

i have learnt most of my thing from redspot

um... can you send me any answer of the question may it be 7 or 14 marks one i'll tell you where the most people are wrong!!

 

[ElLa_Jan]

i have learnt most of my thing from redspot

same here... thats why i'm anxious to know WHY he thinks its wrong!

 

[brainswipe]

like i just said (or maybe u werent reading) i was only giving the points in it, which are almost the same as yours if u check.. i wasnt mentioning ant pattern or structure or order of points!

THAT i understand what you are talking about!! but just to be on the safe side can u plz send me the answer of any question!! AND plz write it yourself!!

 

[ElLa_Jan]

STOP YOUR FRIENDS TOO!!!! I SWEAR TO GOD U NEED TO UNDERSTAND THE ANSWER PATTERN FAST AS YOU CAN!!

my class of 27 people have this book.. so i need a solid reason to stop them, which i wud be glad if u tell!

 

[ElLa_Jan]

THAT i understand what you are talking about!! but just to be on the safe side can u plz send me the answer of any question!!

okay, in a minute!

 

[Daniyal Ahmed]

Q1 How successful were the British attempts to take control of lands in the sub-continent between 1750 and 1856? [14]
ANS: The British were very successful in taking control of lands in the sub-continent between 1750 and 1856.
The British had come to the sub-continent mainly for trade. The British carried on profitable trade for 150 years. To increase and ensure their trade they found it necessary to have political control of lands in the sub-continent.
The first opportunity came in 1757 when the battle of Plassey took place. In this battle Nawab Siraj-ud-Daula was defeated and killed. This gave the control of Bengal in British hands and they put up puppet rulers in Bengal. The British used the wealth of Bengal to increase their power.
It was followed by the battle of Buxur in 1764 in which combined forces of the rulers of Bengal, Oudh and Delhi were defeated by the British. After this Bihar also came under British control. The British obtained massive resources which they successfully used to increase their power and influence.
The British wanted full control of South India to ensure their spice trade. Four battles were fought between the British and rulers of Mysore. Finally in 1799 Tipu Sultan of Mysore was defeated and killed. South India came under British control.
In Deccan the Marathas had risen to power and gave tough resistance to the British. In 1818 the Marathas were finally defeated and whole of Deccan and South India came under British control.
Ranjit Singh had been extending his kingdom and had worried the British so they decided to annex Sindh. All they needed was an excuse. The British general Sir Charles Napier provoked the Amirs of Sindh so much that they attacked the British Residency in 1943. The Amirs were defeated and the Sindh was annexed by the British.
Ranjit Singh had signed a treaty of friendship in 1809 but after his death in 1839 rival chiefs argued amongst themselves over who should be the king. The army attacked British possessions and provoked the British to invade the Punjab. Following the Treaty of Lahore 1846 the Sikh paid a huge indemnity and Gulab Singh Dogra a Hindu chief who had helped the British was given Kashmir as a reward. Finally in 1849 after a revolt against the British the Punjab and the North West Frontier were annexed by the British.
In 1852 the British annexed several Indian states under the ‘Doctrine of Lapse’. In 1856 the large and rich state of Oudh was also taken over by the British under the excuse of misrule.
Thus the British, due to their military superiority were successful in their attempts to take control of the sub-continent between 1750 and 1856.

Whats wrong in this??........

 

[ElLa_Jan]

November 2011, Q4b:
Why was it so difficult to agree on a new constitution in 1950?
There were disvergent views on the future contitution of pakistan in 1950. the objectives resolution of march 1949 was the first step towards constitution making. it was presented to the basic principles committee in september 1950, but majority opposed the proposals of the committee. East pak had a greater population than the west pak and wanted seats in the bicameral parliemen accoprding to size of population. West pak insisted on equal seats for both wings.

East pak also opposed Urdu as the only national language since Bengali was a developed language and there were no regional languages in East pak.

Many regional and religious politicians also opposed the proposals. for the provincial parties, powers of the President and Central Govt. had to be reduced in order to guarantee provincial autonomy. Religious parties wanted enforcemnt of the shariah and considered the resolution insufficientli islamic. Finally, Liaqat Ali Khan had to withdraw the constitutional proposals and Pakistan would have to wait another six years to have its own constitution.

 

[ElLa_Jan]

THAT i understand what you are talking about!! but just to be on the safe side can u plz send me the answer of any question!! AND plz write it yourself!!

wat do you mean by write it yourself? how else wud i send it? magic? ghosts?

 

[aTraveller]

In the 10 marks Question of themes like what are quranic teaching about prophets etc, do we have to write 2-3 complete passages like in the hadis question (individual and community one) ..???

 

[ElLa_Jan]

@brainswipe.. plz explain ure point now! and btw, ure really 26?

 

[brainswipe]

November 2011, Q4b:
Why was it so difficult to agree on a new constitution in 1950?
There were disvergent views on the future contitution of pakistan in 1950. the objectives resolution of march 1949 was the first step towards constitution making. it was presented to the basic principles committee in september 1950, but majority opposed the proposals of the committee. East pak had a greater population than the west pak and wanted seats in the bicameral parliemen accoprding to size of population. west pak insisted on equal seats for both wings.

east pak also opposed urdu as the only national language since bengali was a developed language and there were no regional languages in east pak.

many regional and religious politicians also opposed the proposals. for the provincial parties, powers of the president and central Govt. had to be reduced in order to guarantee provincial autonomy. religious parties wanted enforcemnt of the shariah and considered the resolution insufficientli islamic. finally liaqat ali khan had to withdraw the constitutional proposals nad pakistan would have to wait another six years to have its own constitution.

SO LET ME CLEAR it you, that you have written your answer in the perception that examiner knows what are you going to write!! when i was in your stage i also used to give this kind of answer but it only gave me 5 out of 7, almost in every 7 mark question!! MY teacher explained me how to write the answer is that first before even starting your question you have to think that examiner is a total doopy man with no knowledge or spelling of PAKSTUDIES. right now im the examiner i will only give you 5 out of 7 as the answer u wrote didn't explain anything to me but it was just a bunch of facts!!! only!!! i.e LEVEL 2 of 7 mark now if you just link these facts to the question ...... ah this is all rubbish!!! i know you wont understand it like that ... so in SIMPLE WAY!! lets take your FIRST REASON i.e the under representation of east pakistanis in the government anything related to it is a fact i.e is LEVEL 2 only!! for LEVEL 3:- you have to tell me WHY this under representation of east pakistanis led them to reject the constitution??? i ask you to just answer this question in your next post!!

 

[Daniyal Ahmed]

SO LET ME CLEAR it you, that you have written your answer in the perception that examiner knows what are you going to write!! when i was in your stage i also used to give this kind of answer but it only gave me 5 out of 7, almost in every 7 mark question!! MY teacher explained me how to write the answer is that first before even starting your question you have to think that examiner is a total doopy man with no knowledge or spelling of PAKSTUDIES. right now im the examiner i will only give you 5 out of 7 as the answer u wrote didn't explain anything to me but it was just a bunch of facts!!! only!!! i.e LEVEL 2 of 7 mark now if you just link these facts to the question ...... ah this is all rubbish!!! i know you wont understand it like that ... so in SIMPLE WAY!! lets take your FIRST REASON i.e the under representation of east pakistanis in the government anything related to it is a fact i.e is LEVEL 2 only!! for LEVEL 3:- you have to tell me WHY this under representation of east pakistanis led them to reject the constitution??? i ask you to just answer his question in your next post!!

PLZ help me out in my question as well..

 

[aTraveller]

my class of 27 people have this book.. so i need a solid reason to stop them, which i wud be glad if u tell!

Just don't completely rely on red shot, Idk about pk studies but in isl there is alot of detail missing and I think That's the case with pak studies too, use it but follow the pattern to answer the 14 marks and 7 marks question and look for facts in 4 marks questions..

 

[ElLa_Jan]

SO LET ME CLEAR it you, that you have written your answer in the perception that examiner knows what are you going to write!! when i was in your stage i also used to give this kind of answer but it only gave me 5 out of 7, almost in every 7 mark question!! MY teacher explained me how to write the answer is that first before even starting your question you have to think that examiner is a total doopy man with no knowledge or spelling of PAKSTUDIES. right now im the examiner i will only give you 5 out of 7 as the answer u wrote didn't explain anything to me but it was just a bunch of facts!!! only!!! i.e LEVEL 2 of 7 mark now if you just link these facts to the question ...... ah this is all rubbish!!! i know you wont understand it like that ... so in SIMPLE WAY!! lets take your FIRST REASON i.e the under representation of east pakistanis in the government anything related to it is a fact i.e is LEVEL 2 only!! for LEVEL 3:- you have to tell me WHY this under representation of east pakistanis led them to reject the constitution??? i ask you to just answer his question in your next post!!

i dnt get what ur question is..
WHY this under representation of east pakistanis led them to reject the constitution? well, because they knew they had a larger population? their rights were being neglected? pls be bit more clear, i want to understand ure point!

 

[ElLa_Jan]

Just don't completely rely on red shot, Idk about pk studies but in isl there is alot of detail missing and I think That's the case with pak studies too, use it but follow the pattern to answer the 14 marks and 7 marks question and look for facts in 4 marks questions..

i agree that itss rubbissh in islamiat, my islamiat sir never used it! but my pakstdies sir did, alot!

 

[brainswipe]

PLZ help me out in my question as well..

you will gain 14 out of 14 in your question!!!!!! BECAUSE this question is an UNSTRUCTURED, meaning that the question only requires DESCRIPTION that is LEVEL2 as the question states 'HOW' this is 1000000 times more different than the word 'WHY'. i hope you understand that WHY i gave you full marks!! however, i want you to write an answer over the REASONING i.e is WHY questions!!!

 

[brainswipe]

i dnt get what ur question is..
WHY this under representation of east pakistanis led them to reject the constitution? well, because they knew they had a larger population? their rights were being neglected? pls be bit more clear, i want to understand ure point!

CONGRATULATION!! you have now gained 6 out of 7 marks you just gave me the answer what i want was this statement that u just wrote!! " because they knew they had a larger population? their rights were being neglected"

 

[ElLa_Jan]

you will gain 14 out of 14 in your question!!!!!! BECAUSE this question is an UNSTRUCTURED, meaning that the question only requires DESCRIPTION that is LEVEL2 as the question states 'HOW' this is 1000000 times more different than the word 'WHY'. i hope you understand that WHY i gave you full marks!! however, i want you to write an answer over the REASONING i.e is WHY questions!!!

well, the anwer he gave is the same i put into point form and posted!! wat was wrong in THAT? This IS the correct answer and it IS from Redspot..