• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Pakistan Studies, Islamiyat and Urdu: Post your doubts here!

Messages
8,392
Reaction score
9,461
Points
573
Re: HISTORY Rare questions !!

we are discussing this question
Why were the wars of 1965 and 1971 fought between Pakistan and India? (7)
 
Messages
3,809
Reaction score
3,115
Points
273
Re: HISTORY Rare questions !!

yeah i know but i think it should be this way!!!! now we will need a high scorer in pak studies or a very knowlegded person to help us here!!!
 
Messages
4,162
Reaction score
1,119
Points
173
Re: HISTORY Rare questions !!

okay
were the reason for partition of Bengal more important than it reversal.Do u agree or not.Explain with reasons (14)

I think reversal is important what do u guys say just tell which one is important and a little note not more than 5 lines if u do it no body shall read it :p :p :p :p

SO ANSWER THIS NOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Messages
8,392
Reaction score
9,461
Points
573
Re: HISTORY Rare questions !!

scouserlfc said:
okay
were the reason for partition of Bengal more important than it reversal.Do u agree or not.Explain with reasons (14)

I think reversal is important what do u guys say just tell which one is important and a little note not more than 5 lines if u do it no body shall read it :p :p :p :p

SO ANSWER THIS NOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The reason for partition of bengal were more important that those caused its reversal !! i truely agree with this statement.
to answer this
Write about why Bengal was partition.
then write why it was reversed !!
then opinion.
 
Messages
3,809
Reaction score
3,115
Points
273
Re: HISTORY Rare questions !!

i rather think the reversal because if they were not more important than the partition then no reversal would have taken place............just common sense!!
 
Messages
8,392
Reaction score
9,461
Points
573
Re: HISTORY Rare questions !!

I think its the partition of Bengal as British had no plans to reverse it until the protest by Hindus !!
 
Messages
4,162
Reaction score
1,119
Points
173
Re: HISTORY Rare questions !!

no yaar read the question again and again ull see that they say that were the resons for partition more imp then the reversal walay reasons so u see the main cause for partition was geo problems there were others but this was the main sole reason while reversal was done after flurry of problems,the british textile industry suffered losses more everyday,the protests and the INC approach and the Minto assasination attack and other hindu and British policies so u see that reversal reasons were more important.
so Spidey and rafae are correct.
 
Messages
4,162
Reaction score
1,119
Points
173
Re: HISTORY Rare questions !!

Read the thing above and then answer this question also some tricky stuff this.

Why was it necessary to hold three Round Table Conferences (1930–32)? [7]
 
Messages
8,392
Reaction score
9,461
Points
573
Re: HISTORY Rare questions !!

scouserlfc said:
no yaar read the question again and again ull see that they say that were the resons for partition more imp then the reversal walay reasons so u see the main cause for partition was geo problems there were others but this was the main sole reason while reversal was done after flurry of problems,the british textile industry suffered losses more everyday,the protests and the INC approach and the Minto assasination attack and other hindu and British policies so u see that reversal reasons were more important.
so Spidey and rafae are correct.

I think you guys are right as 3 minds are better than one !! but there are also many other reasons for partition of Bengal!
1)geo problem
2)British wanted to develop backward areas of Bengal
3)British wanted to counter Hindu protest
4)British wanted to have friendly relation with muslims by giving them majority !!

scouserlfc said:
Why was it necessary to hold three Round Table Conferences (1930–32)? [7]

Pretty easy
-British held first R.T.C as Simon Commision was not able to frame a constitution for India which Indians liked. Mr.Jinnah gave British recommendation to hold R.T.C so they could get the Indian views
-Second was held as Congress boycotted the first one and Minority problem could not be solved.
-Third was held as Gandhi had taken Hard line and refused to acknowledge the minority problem in India so the R.T.C had failed.
 
Messages
3,809
Reaction score
3,115
Points
273
Re: HISTORY Rare questions !!

the ones you have put up all end up at whether geo problems or eco problems no other brother!!;-)
 
Messages
113
Reaction score
17
Points
28
Re: HISTORY Rare questions !!

Can u tell the answer of mintchocolate's question if the rule of british between 1877 to 1911 was successful or not? (14)
Secondly, Benazirs first rule was more successful than her second right? And so was Nawaz Sharif's?
And aslo lil significant progress was made during late 20th century?
And significance of Khilafat movement? (14)
I want sourceflc and salmanpakrokx to answer this question plx!
 
Messages
8,392
Reaction score
9,461
Points
573
Re: HISTORY Rare questions !!

Ahh lets see your First Question
nightmaressana said:
Can u tell the answer of mintchocolate's question if the rule of british between 1877 to 1911 was successful or not? (14)
Well this is a rare type of Question but I do think that the rule of british was successful because
-Firstly British government had taken full authority of India after the rebillion of 1857 so the British rule was unchallenged.
-British had banned several critics and the editors of newspaper as they wrote against the British.
-Indians had little power and because of Act of 1874 (though i m not conformed) Indians could not own weapons so there was no question of rebillion.
I think that is it !! btw where did you get this question !! it isn't in past paper neither I consider it important

For your second question.
nightmaressana said:
Secondly, Benazirs first rule was more successful than her second right? And so was Nawaz Sharif's?
Benazir's first rule was more successful because
-Rural electrification
-Ending ban on trade union
-Re-joining Common Wealth
-Improving relations with U.S.

As for Nawaz also his first was important because
-Gwadar miniport project started
-Motor way project
-Taxis given on loan.

lets see the third one
nightmaressana said:
And aslo lil significant progress was made during late 20th century?
Very little significant progress made only in terms of development. No progress made in Industrial or Agricultural Sector.

Lets see 4th one
nightmaressana said:
And significance of Khilafat movement? (14)
Importance of Khilafat movement
-United Muslims and Hindus
-Showed the power of Indians to the British
-Muslims ready to stand up for the Caliph strengthen the unity between them.
-British realized the need to protect the Caliph.

I think that is it !! This question can NEVER come as it has no statement or success or failure to explain.

That is it !! hope I helped !! :)
 
Messages
40
Reaction score
2
Points
18
Re: HISTORY Rare questions !!

scouserlfc said:
Spidey21 said:
scouserlfc said:
Explain the stuff to a great deal and be sure that you write the main points for that particular question,Well just got to ask you is your writing very small.Because mine is a little big and i almost fill 3/4 of a big full scape sheet.

i almost write a complete page and please could you please explain me the exact format of the 7 mark question about how many points are to be written i am confused!!

Well not much a hard and fast type a format just dont use points or write in the point form.
Mainly u have to know three main reasons for a question and then u explain those reasons completely and according to question.Divide the whole work in three paras mostly as u have three points,no introduction like if question asks abt reversal of Partition of Bengal u never ever write abt the Partition of Bengal never do it !!! :p
Well thats how i do and no conclusion in the end for 7 marks its useless and dont write long accounts and dont just keep writing what ever u know abt the topic in the ques just give what ques asks and u surely can get all 7/7 marks :D :D
my teacher says that u dont have to make paras in 7 mark ques
 
Messages
8,392
Reaction score
9,461
Points
573
Re: HISTORY Rare questions !!

I think you have to !! as it represent the start of a new point !!
 
Top