- Messages
- 103
- Reaction score
- 1,308
- Points
- 153
recently, only 3 questions were from qbox, the other were different
one important thing u have to remember that both statements r correct, no one is wrong, u have to give resons for the support of one reson it is a comparison uestion... u have to evaluate,,, the reason which u have support 4-5 points for its benefits, adbantages etc... the one u have not agreed upon, 2-3 reasons for your dislike,u can also give a cover sentence in end
Mussab_Awan and Rizwan Javed thanks alotYou're talking about the Pakistan Studies Paper 2, right?
Well if so, you need to follow the following things to write a strong answer:
1. Firstly, read the statements thoroughly, and decide one statement which you are going to support.
2. Once you have selected a statement, write the positive supporting points for that. On the other hand, write negative points for the other statement.
(Three points for each statement would be sufficient)
3. In the end write a solid conclusion, summing up everything in it and give examples of places, schemes, projects etc which are going on in Pakistan to support your positive points you have made earlier.
Here's a specimen answer:
Read the following two statements.
A: “More agricultural training colleges are needed for young people in Pakistan”
B: “More grants, tools and seeds should be provided by the government to existing farmers
in Pakistan”
Which statement do you agree with more? Give reasons for your answer and refer to places
or examples you have studied in Pakistan to support your answer.
Answer:
I would agree with the first statement because more agricultural training colleges would provide more education and awareness to young farmers about agriculture. They would introduce the farmers with modern agricultural methods to obtain higher yield . Moreover, farmers would learn about correct use of fertilizers to get higher yield and of water irrigation to avoid water logging and salinity . Farmers would learn the use of machinery and again this would grant them higher yield.( You have supported this statement and now you are gonna criticise the other )
Providing more agricultural tools and seeds to the farmers would prove costly to the government and resultantly , this would deteriorate the government budget. The farmers would practice their usual and traditional farming methods which wouldn't result in a higher yield. Illiterate farmers would not know the use of modern tools and machinery and all these things and efforts will go in vain. ( Mush criticism has been done over the second statement and now you are gonna write the conclusion)
The main objective of these two policies and ideas is to gain a higher yield of crops . In my point of view, this can be achieved much successfully using the first idea . To support my view, the Agriculture University in Faisalabad is a sound example which is instilling talent among the youth. ( AND HERE YOU GO AND GRAB 6/6)