We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
what was everyone's last v value? with error
well i jus wrote that the observer determines when the light sources becomes one.
i don remember the uncertainity part but my highest uncertainity in the table was 0.05ish..and the first one was exactly the same as urs..btw hw do u remeber all dis after the exam??does anyone else want to say what they got
i got .54 +-.09
i got the error as 24%
the gradient ws like .864+-.17 ish
my biggest error in the table was like +-.15 and the rest were lower
and my k value was like 21.4 or sumfin like that,
people gott around those values, it was really easy to make mistakes in that second bit
the graph passed really close to the origin
since its been more than 24 hours,for the question
depen:theta
idepen:wavelen
then distance to lamp and observer would be constant
also the intensity of the lamp would be constant
then i used the equation theta=kl
thus a relation would be a straight line through origin
then i said fix a protractor to the table at the point of the observer
then also you diff wavlen you could change the colour of the bulbs to diff colours
use the same observer each time
repeat multiple times and take an average for theta
then safty precautions were the bulb could be hot
also the bright light could cause eye damage, so wear glasses
preform the experiment in dark room
bulbs on a track so you can move then closer to eachother
move bulbs closer by the same distance, first by larger amounts then smaller value for a accurate result
also to check that the bulbs are the same power by measuring the p.d across them using a volt meter
also side walls to block light and direct observers eyes only to the two bulbs
and it was not even the error in v btw,nahh im sure i did it right, most of the good people in our school got the same answer, all i did was rearrange the equation in terms of v, there were two sets of data with errors you only had to half one set and add the other to it, not half the full thing
Wait ur talking about k or vYou actually had to halve that error cuz when using the vsquared formula, at the end you have to square root both sides and the percentage uncertainty halves when you square root. I got plus or minus 14%
what u get for kWait ur talking about k or v
yeah this is what most people got,21.65 rand off to 21.7
27.1% error
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now