- Messages
- 341
- Reaction score
- 224
- Points
- 53
did you get T1 in shm as 0.429?
We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
reduced gain was an advantage toowasn't increased stability an advantage?
yh it should beIs this correct. I wrote this line :
" The process in which a part of the output is fed into the inverting input and the input and the output are out of phase by 180 degrees "
And for the effects , I wrote :
a) Reduced gain
b) Lesser distortion
Yess.. 0.43 sdid you get T1 in shm as 0.429?
yhdid you get T1 in shm as 0.429?
OH THANK GOD(part of) the output is added to /returned to / mixed with the input
and is out of phase with the input / fed to inverting input
this is what the ms says. i think u'll get 2/2
YHthe time period was for 8 boxes i think and we had to look at 12 .
yh i wrote this twoi wrote that computers processes the 2d images from slices to give a three dimensional image of the structure.
the mark scheme mentions output in brackets so i think it's fine without it tooguys you should mention that part of the out put VOLTAGE is fed back not just output thats inaccurate
but always stresses on voltage, you must mention that it is the voltage that is fed back not just outputthe mark scheme mentions output in brackets so i think it's fine without it too
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now