We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
unplugged said:How did you do the gradient question in the first page ;>
I tried that but when you try it with the different values , you get different masses. oh well.Rangers said:unplugged said:How did you do the gradient question in the first page ;>
I ignored the work Gradient in the question
i just took the Acc and Force from graphc and used F=MA
My line began at 1.2N. I took a point. 14. 14-1.2 = 12.8 and the acceleration at 14 was 2.25m/s^2. So 12.8/2.25 = 5.688888888889unplugged said:How did you do the gradient question in the first page ;>
The ray would never go out of the fiber , if it did , then the data would not be delivered.Rangers said:How many reflection line where there For the optical fibre? i got one reflection and after that the line went out.
y is fibre having many layers? i wrote so the ray dosnt pass through the Material
What u guys say correct or wrong?
If you mean 5.7 is the gradient , then yes. But i was wondering about the mass. I got the mass to be the same as the gradient >_>.WayneRooney10 said:My line began at 1.2N. I took a point. 14. 14-1.2 = 12.8 and the acceleration at 14 was 2.25m/s^2. So 12.8/2.25 = 5.688888888889unplugged said:How did you do the gradient question in the first page ;>
Rounding up = 5.7
thats how I did it. Dunno if its right or wrong.
unplugged said:The ray would never go out of the fiber , if it did , then the data would not be delivered.Rangers said:How many reflection line where there For the optical fibre? i got one reflection and after that the line went out.
y is fibre having many layers? i wrote so the ray dosnt pass through the Material
What u guys say correct or wrong?
Should have been something like this
No , just one ray. It was just the first image of a fibre wire i found.Ahmooosh said:so we were supposed to end up with 2 sets of lines???
I used P1 x V1 = P2 x V2 to find itRangers said:What is the volume of bubble?
CorrectWayneRooney10 said:That question, i can't remember what I did. Anyway, what did you get for that tsunami question, the last part. Warning time. I got 2256seconds. or something like that.
WayneRooney10 said:I used P1 x V1 = P2 x V2 to find itRangers said:What is the volume of bubble?
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now