ohh, then im guessing you probably haven't studient polarizing power yet? in that case dont worry about that, that MCQ is out of syllabus for you as well
We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
ohh, then im guessing you probably haven't studient polarizing power yet? in that case dont worry about that, that MCQ is out of syllabus for you as well
thankss but are sure cz the same question was repeated in may june 2012 varient 11??ohh, then im guessing you probably haven't studient polarizing power yet? in that case dont worry about that, that MCQ is out of syllabus for you as well
thankss but are sure cz the same question was repeated in may june 2012 varient 11??
yhh didnt take polarizing power
Hmm, in that case it might have been referring to some other property..as you already know though, eff. refers to CO2 usually, and down group II reactivity decreases so we have to use harsher methods...maybe thats all they were relating to?
Use of the Data Booklet is relevant to this question.
When 3.00 g of an anhydrous nitrate of a Group II metal is decomposed, 1.53 g of gas is
produced.
What is the nitrate compound?
A beryllium nitrate
B calcium nitrate
C magnesium nitrate
D strontium nitrate help plz
I know this sounds long and tedious, but the sure-shot way would be for you to calculate the MR of all the mentioned nitrates, divide 3 grams on each to see the number of moles it would represent, and then see if said nitrates decomposition product [lets call it XO] fits the bill, as it will have the same number of moles, and if 1.53 is the answer you get [by multiplying the number of moles mentioned previously with the MR of the decomposition product], there's your answer.
can u please tell what is the answer for this
LOL i knw you wanna kill me at the moment but i didnt understand it i told u am bad in chem hope ur not regretting that u post an answer
ahaha, no, its no problem, but as you can see queen has already answered the question in full now
same doubt here ANYONE PLEASE
once more guys please post marking scheme as well!
as the question says, PbCl4 turns into PbCl2, meaning 2 chlorine are lost, thus 2 moles of bromine are released.
so if you form equation, it becomes:
PbCl4 + 2NaBr -> PbCl2 + 2NaCl + Br2.
As we have 6.98grams we divide by Mr of PbCl4 and get 0.02 moles
multiply by 2, thats 0.04 moles of NaBr [as the mole ratio is 1:2 between the two reactants]
0.04 moles of NaBr reacting means 0.04 moles of Bromine gas being released as seen in the above equation.
0.04 x 79.9 = 3.196 = Option C= +1 mark
once more guys please post marking scheme as well!
as the question says, PbCl4 turns into PbCl2, meaning 2 chlorine are lost, thus 2 moles of bromine are released.
so if you form equation, it becomes:
PbCl4 + 2NaBr -> PbCl2 + 2NaCl + Br2.
As we have 6.98grams we divide by Mr of PbCl4 and get 0.02 moles
multiply by 2, thats 0.04 moles of NaBr [as the mole ratio is 1:2 between the two reactants]
0.04 moles of NaBr reacting means 0.04 moles of Bromine gas being released as seen in the above equation.
0.04 x 79.9 = 3.196 = Option C= +1 mark
thnks... i cudnt form the equation, the rest is fine
Hmm, in that case it might have been referring to some other property..as you already know though, eff. refers to CO2 usually, and down group II reactivity decreases so we have to use harsher methods...maybe thats all they were relating to?
doesn't reactivity increase down group 2 ? i thought reactivity decreases down group 7 (halogens)
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now