- Messages
- 310
- Reaction score
- 125
- Points
- 53
Yes i understand i simply misunderstood the questionSulfur has 2 unpaired
We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
Yes i understand i simply misunderstood the questionSulfur has 2 unpaired
For the question that came volatility decrease because bond energy increases.Repeat question.vanderwall increase as number of electron increaseSo it is induced or permanent?
I know this but what i didnt know was the other name of van der waal forces.For the question that came volatility decrease because bond energy increases.Repeat question.vanderwall increase as number of electron increase
There isin't any 'other' vanderwall forces.There is only one vanderwall force. permenant dipole is not type of vanderwall.other one iss hydrogenI know this but what i didnt know was the other name of van der waal forces.
I mean induced dipole/london dispersion forcesThere isin't any 'other' vanderwall forces.There is only one vanderwall force. permenant dipole is not type of vanderwall.other one iss hydrogen
Bond energy DECREASES down the groupFor the question that came volatility decrease because bond energy increases.Repeat question.vanderwall increase as number of electron increase
yes bond lenght increase bond energy decreasee but option was something related to vandewall forces right.do you rememmber the exact correct answerBond energy DECREASES down the group
Yeah it was that temporary dipole induced dipole forces increase down the group something like thatyes bond lenght increase bond energy decreasee but option was something related to vandewall forces right.do you rememmber the exact correct answer
yeah i choosed thatYeah it was that temporary dipole induced dipole forces increase down the group something like that
Yeah it was that temporary dipole induced dipole forces increase down the group something like that
We don't have that much of a great memory lmaoWhich page was this on??
That is pretty obvious...non polar molecules only have vander waal's forces bw the molecules which are broken during melting/boilingWhich page was this on??
The brown gas is for nitrates but it was sulfates so only litmus turns blue and white soilid right?That is pretty obvious...non polar molecules only have vander waal's forces bw the molecules which are broken during melting/boiling
YesThe brown gas is for nitrates but it was sulfates so only litmus turns blue and white soilid right?
What was the answer of combustion reaction in which volume of co2 given n mass of hydrocarbon compound
the empirical formula one? CH2OWhat was the answer of combustion reaction in which volume of co2 given n mass of hydrocarbon compound
No it was another one on the start of paper it was of combustion co2 and h2o produce n we need to find the compound burnt in excess of oxygenthe empirical formula one? CH2O
does anyone of you remember the question where we had to say which molecules showed cis trans isomerism ( section B ) . what did you guys get
It's B for cisthe empirical formula one? CH2O
does anyone of you remember the question where we had to say which molecules showed cis trans isomerism ( section B ) . what did you guys get
CHO? lolNo it was another one on the start of paper it was of combustion co2 and h2o produce n we need to find the compound burnt in excess of oxygen
Man i did cho too but i think it was wrong ):CHO? lol
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now