HOW WAS PHYSICS PAPER 2 AS!!!!!!!!!!!

[Nisrit Pandey]

Yep ur right same here. but we shouldn't discuss befo 24 hours. Dont want others to read and effect the GT

yeah mine too!

 

[Nisrit Pandey]

i

are u sure its 500?? the frequency i mean

it was 1000

 

[Nisrit Pandey]

it was easy???

IT WAS DAMM EASYYYYYYYY!

ok dont freak out

 

[fathimaash]

although da papr looked ok i was tooooo lengty
60 mks papr for just 60 mins..

 

[Rvzie]

hey.. how many questions were there?

 

[ghlamo]

p22
MINE SUCKED...WHAT WAS THE FREQUENCY? I GOT 1000 AND ANS WAS 500.
WHAT WAS THE LAST ANS IN NUCLEAR QUESTION? EXPLAINING PART
WHAT WAS C IN 1ST Q N UNCERTAINTY ?
EXPECTED GRADE? min is 46

NO BUH I ALSO GOT 1000 FREQUENCY and almost all my frnds got the same how can u say it was 500

 

[ali_6193]

http://xat.com/paper62stats can discuss paper here come on this link and discuss p2 physics its kinda chat window

 

[hussamh10]

i dunno if they r rite
but i got 13m/s for the speed dunt remember the rest

it is right

 

[WhereAmazingHappens]

NO BUH I ALSO GOT 1000 FREQUENCY and almost all my frnds got the same how can u say it was 500

it is 500

u and ur friends have (lambda)/4 instead of (lambda)/2

 

[WhereAmazingHappens]

i
it was 1000

nah its 500

u used (lambda)/4 instead of (lambda)/2

(lambda)/2 is correct

 

[BILALrox01]

NO BUH I ALSO GOT 1000 FREQUENCY and almost all my frnds got the same how can u say it was 500

pretty sure it was 500. my class wrote 1000 too but wen i explained they agreed i was ryt

 

[Mattman]

wait wat??
lambda is 0.34m v=340 how can it b 500??

 

[ghlamo]

pretty sure it was 500. my class wrote 1000 too but wen i explained they agreed i was ryt

so explain me aswell

 

[fathimaash]

wait wat??
lambda is 0.34m v=340 how can it b 500??

i know hw cn it be 500

 

[ghlamo]

wait wat??
lambda is 0.34m v=340 how can it b 500??

maybe we had to divide it by 2 because it was not lambda buh the distance between 2 nodes

 

[ghlamo]

and what a

pretty sure it was 500. my class wrote 1000 too but wen i explained they agreed i was ryt

and what about question no 4 last part was resistance decreasing

 

[WhereAmazingHappens]

wait wat??
lambda is 0.34m v=340 how can it b 500??

lambda is not 0.34m

(lambda)/2 = (o.34/100)

It was given in centimeters not meters

 

[WhereAmazingHappens]

and what a

and what about question no 4 last part was resistance decreasing

yeah resistance decreases when light increases

 

[Ahmed Tariq]

nah its 500

u used (lambda)/4 instead of (lambda)/2

(lambda)/2 is correct

You are wrong, my friend. Using lambda/2 gave the answer as 1000 Hz. I am certain of that.

 

[Mattman]

i remember one of the question ask what is the wavelength
neway, what u guys got for the Tension T??