• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

HOW WAS PHYSICS PAPER 2 AS!!!!!!!!!!!

egy

Messages
292
Reaction score
66
Points
38
guys it is not good to behave in this way we have to respect each other........ it is not the way to discuss forget it what done is done u cannot change it now ...:notworthy:
 
Messages
168
Reaction score
43
Points
38
oh yar we ALWAYS include to resistive force when total output power is given, however only when we have excluded the out put force it is P=Fv...............
Man u again said total output power. It was just output power..both words have different meaning u know :p
 
Messages
242
Reaction score
99
Points
53
Yep i am why ask? R u from there too?
u got sir sumair over there aye????......heard he is the tycoon of physics in pindi........hey so how were peoples papers over there... we can easily determine GT by validating roots result...they got geniuses, world toppers, mediocres, and even straigt Us!!!
 
Messages
242
Reaction score
99
Points
53
Man u again said total output power. It was just output power..both words have different meaning u know :p
dude it just " sounds rite " to say that the motor does work agains resistence also so the gpe gained per sec is less ten power out put, see they didnt mention "useful", so then the power output includes heat/sound/mechanical energy etc...........i think if ur answeris based on useful, then its correct, and if our answers are based on simple output...then they cant be wrong either......
 
Messages
168
Reaction score
43
Points
38
dude it just " sounds rite " to say that the motor does work agains resistence also so the gpe gained per sec is less ten power out put, see they didnt mention "useful", so then the power output includes heat/sound/mechanical energy etc...........i think if ur answeris based on useful, then its correct, and if our answers are based on simple output...then they cant be wrong either......
Hahah..YES we've got him..the ONE and Only Sir Sumair. and i asked him about this he said both will be credited since he didn't specifically mention input power. And well for gt is below 40 for sure caz everyones paper here didn't go well either. Except from 2-3 geniuses who'll get above 55 :p and well i'll tell u one thing the ratio of good students to bad ones in roots is 1:25 :p caz most of the good Olevel students go bad in AS :p
 
Messages
242
Reaction score
99
Points
53
Well there are a lot of hamza khans here :p r u talking about the one with the height of 6-5?
and how did math/ chem go .....here at my centre there are 295 private candidates which are re appearing so its tough to get an insight on how easy/difficult the paper actually was.
 
Messages
168
Reaction score
43
Points
38
and how did math/ chem go .....here at my centre there are 295 private candidates which are re appearing so its tough to get an insight on how easy/difficult the paper actually was.
Math P1 20% good 80 % bad..M1 5% good 95% bad :p..chem ppr 1..50-50..ppr 2..50/50..prac variant 3 50-50..prac variant 4 70-30...:p these are just estimates they might get more or less :p and hamza the one with the weird sorta hair :p
 
Messages
282
Reaction score
42
Points
38
Math P1 20% good 80 % bad..M1 5% good 95% bad :p..chem ppr 1..50-50..ppr 2..50/50..prac variant 3 50-50..prac variant 4 70-30...:p these are just estimates they might get more or less :p and hamza the one with the weird sorta hair :p
wat do u mean chem practical variant 4 was 70-30??/ o_O
me from roots too...nd gave S4 ...it was kind of 40-60 :p
 
Messages
168
Reaction score
43
Points
38
wat do u mean chem practical variant 4 was 70-30??/ o_O
me from roots too...nd gave S4 ...it was kind of 40-60 :p
dont knw bout u man..by 70/30 i mean out of 100 laik log 70% ka acha huva..im not counting the people who know nothing here :p and plus it went way better than S3 :p Atleast they didn't have any sort of problem with their chemicals n all...for s3 half the second batch of students had a deviation of 5-10 cm3 just because of poor lab management :p
 
Top