- Messages
- 326
- Reaction score
- 172
- Points
- 53
I guess they forgot to teach you mannersAt least my school taught me that the independant variable goes to the x axis and the dependant on the y axis
We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
I guess they forgot to teach you mannersAt least my school taught me that the independant variable goes to the x axis and the dependant on the y axis
Man u again said total output power. It was just output power..both words have different meaning u knowoh yar we ALWAYS include to resistive force when total output power is given, however only when we have excluded the out put force it is P=Fv...............
Yep i am why ask? R u from there too?Any of u from roots DHA 1 pindi?
nice it means u know Muhammad Hamza Khan?.......no im from ace in BT.........a min drive rom roots dha.......Yep i am why ask? R u from there too?
u got sir sumair over there aye????......heard he is the tycoon of physics in pindi........hey so how were peoples papers over there... we can easily determine GT by validating roots result...they got geniuses, world toppers, mediocres, and even straigt Us!!!Yep i am why ask? R u from there too?
dude it just " sounds rite " to say that the motor does work agains resistence also so the gpe gained per sec is less ten power out put, see they didnt mention "useful", so then the power output includes heat/sound/mechanical energy etc...........i think if ur answeris based on useful, then its correct, and if our answers are based on simple output...then they cant be wrong either......Man u again said total output power. It was just output power..both words have different meaning u know
Hahah..YES we've got him..the ONE and Only Sir Sumair. and i asked him about this he said both will be credited since he didn't specifically mention input power. And well for gt is below 40 for sure caz everyones paper here didn't go well either. Except from 2-3 geniuses who'll get above 55 and well i'll tell u one thing the ratio of good students to bad ones in roots is 1:25 caz most of the good Olevel students go bad in ASdude it just " sounds rite " to say that the motor does work agains resistence also so the gpe gained per sec is less ten power out put, see they didnt mention "useful", so then the power output includes heat/sound/mechanical energy etc...........i think if ur answeris based on useful, then its correct, and if our answers are based on simple output...then they cant be wrong either......
Well there are a lot of hamza khans here r u talking about the one with the height of 6-5?nice it means u know Muhammad Hamza Khan?.......no im from ace in BT.........a min drive rom roots dha.......
the pathan who is 5-11 ish, from abbottabad, he was my class mate, had 8As in o level, u know him?,,i thnk hes taken like 6 subsWell there are a lot of hamza khans here r u talking about the one with the height of 6-5?
and how did math/ chem go .....here at my centre there are 295 private candidates which are re appearing so its tough to get an insight on how easy/difficult the paper actually was.Well there are a lot of hamza khans here r u talking about the one with the height of 6-5?
Math P1 20% good 80 % bad..M1 5% good 95% bad ..chem ppr 1..50-50..ppr 2..50/50..prac variant 3 50-50..prac variant 4 70-30... these are just estimates they might get more or less and hamza the one with the weird sorta hairand how did math/ chem go .....here at my centre there are 295 private candidates which are re appearing so its tough to get an insight on how easy/difficult the paper actually was.
wat do u mean chem practical variant 4 was 70-30??/Math P1 20% good 80 % bad..M1 5% good 95% bad ..chem ppr 1..50-50..ppr 2..50/50..prac variant 3 50-50..prac variant 4 70-30... these are just estimates they might get more or less and hamza the one with the weird sorta hair
Done.Please delete his comments too. Thanks.
dont knw bout u man..by 70/30 i mean out of 100 laik log 70% ka acha huva..im not counting the people who know nothing here and plus it went way better than S3 Atleast they didn't have any sort of problem with their chemicals n all...for s3 half the second batch of students had a deviation of 5-10 cm3 just because of poor lab managementwat do u mean chem practical variant 4 was 70-30??/
me from roots too...nd gave S4 ...it was kind of 40-60
Btw whats ur name?wat do u mean chem practical variant 4 was 70-30??/
me from roots too...nd gave S4 ...it was kind of 40-60
Aadil SajjadBtw whats ur name?
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now