• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Mathematics: Post your doubts here!

Messages
478
Reaction score
143
Points
53
Whoa, man! To find mod of a complex no., you use this formula:

If z = a+bi
then |z| = sqrt(a^2+b^2)

because if you plot z on an Argand diagram, you can find the length of the line (from origin to z) using Pythagoras theorem as it makes a triangle. And that length is mod of z. You getting it?

And what's iota? The 'i'? Well, i just differentiates between the real and unreal part of the complex no. so that is why it isn't written during calculations (e.g. when finding arg z, you don't write i in the formula)

Hope you understand it because this my first time explaining something on xtremepapers!
thanks buddy. What abt part ii question i asked
 
Messages
14
Reaction score
8
Points
13
In second part i dont get it from 3rd step onwards. After squaring on both sides why is (z-2i)^2 equal to (z-2i)(z-2i)*. I dont get the conjuguate part (*)

DON'T read the first part where I crossed it. The answer starts from |z-2i| = 4

Well, I used the relationship given in part (i). As they made us prove it, there must be some use of it, right? But I did it this way (as I proved in reverse) :

because |z|^2 = zz* {Part (i) question}
then |z-2i|^2 = (z-2i)(z-2i)* {z is a complex no. so z-2i must also be a complex no. because add/subt of a complx no. = another complx no.}
 
Messages
124
Reaction score
30
Points
38
oh okay.
So the question says "reflex" angle which means it's greater than 180 degree and less than 360 degree, which falls in 3rd and 4th quadrant where sin(theta) is negative. So you use a negative sign to indicate that.
 
Messages
924
Reaction score
1,096
Points
153
The complex one.
Note that for the diagram question, the origin of my circle should be at (0,2) but it looks like it's slightly higher. I only realised that later so yeah just imagine it like that :)
y61043tYKCSJ1WVaRffY305H.jpg
farhan141
 
Messages
924
Reaction score
1,096
Points
153
Um, why did you eliminate x if x>0? x can't be 1 only.
No I divided by x on both sides.
I justified this by reminding that x>0 so it cannot be equal to zero.
If you divide zero on both sides you can run into all sorts of trouble. But as long as x is not zero you can divide on both sides like that.
Or you can think of it as just factoring out x. Then the second bracket can be equated to zero as well.
 
Messages
14
Reaction score
8
Points
13
No I divided by x on both sides.
I justified this by reminding that x>0 so it cannot be equal to zero.
If you divide zero on both sides you can run into all sorts of trouble. But as long as x is not zero you can divide on both sides like that.
Or you can think of it as just factoring out x. Then the second bracket can be equated to zero as well.

Ohhh, right. Thanks a lot!
 
Top