• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Physics: Post your doubts here!

Messages
665
Reaction score
13,609
Points
503
Two readings are not enough to draw a valid conclusion
The masses provided may not be of accurate values mentioned
The loop over the rod keeps sliding
The ruler balancing only for a short period of time so difficult to note x and y

are these correct?
1st n 3rd seem to be correct..dont know abt 2nd n 4th since masses provided r always accurate as instructed in the confidential instructions
n abt 4th...well in my case it stayed on until i removed it myself...in my case even 3rd one wasn't happening but it was a kind of problem for my fellows so 3rd one seems logical
 
Messages
665
Reaction score
13,609
Points
503
Messages
665
Reaction score
13,609
Points
503
I think i was getting around 154g but i wrote 1.54 g 2 Marks are gone for sure for the value of g and this some marks will be deducted from errors.I feel screwed up.What were your values of k?
idr but the criterion was proving the statement valid 18.5% difference was there
i think 3.48 n 2.94 idr really wbuu?
 
Messages
665
Reaction score
13,609
Points
503
Tbh,when i was doing it i found it easy.But now i think i am losing many marks and even the gt is going to be at least 30.
let's just pray n try to get the best out of our MCQs
Allah will decide what's better for us
but the fact that pracs weigh 23% only is quite satisfying
 
Messages
341
Reaction score
224
Points
53
Exactly what comforts me is that my P2 went really really good,like 55+ is a must so i hope that covers the blunders i did in p3,hopefully
 
Top