That's what I said.just checked the er and it said vital capacity cannot increase, it's just the tidal vol that increases
"For TIDAL VOLUME to increase, X and Y will have to decrease."
We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
That's what I said.just checked the er and it said vital capacity cannot increase, it's just the tidal vol that increases
thanx, that really helpedYes, that's how they are loaded at the source but the point is that the sources are the photosynthesising leaves, while the sinks are other parts of the plant, like the roots, storage organs. So, when the sugars are loaded into the sieve elements of the leaves, this means that there is more solute in the phloem sap. If you look at my answers above about solute potential is related to water potential, I have said solute potential is always negative, meaning more solute REDUCES/DECREASES water potential. The key here, to avoid confusion, is to understand that solute concentration is inversely proportional to water potential, and increasing it reduces water potential.
This is the part i am emphasizing on, the vital capacity cannot changeIt increases.
That was for Tidal Volume too.This is the part i am emphasizing on, the vital capacity cannot change
just checked the er and it said vital capacity cannot increase, it's just the tidal vol that increases
that really helped, jazakallahDuring excercise tidal volume increases and this will decrease Inspiratory Reserve Volume (i.e. the volume of air which u could inhale but dont) - in this case, volume X. Same goes for volume Y. Thing of Reserve Volumes as a Bank of air. When u excercise u take loans of air from ur reserve and this loan is what increases ur tidal volume. Oh and thanks for ur reply up there
Because it binds to the 'Enzyme-substrate' complex where the active site has already been occupied.
help needed!!!!!! question 34, 38 and 40 of oct/nov/13/2010
i think the circumference decreases as the cohesion-tension forces decreasesIf it's not too late does anybody understand the relationship between the girth (circumference) of a tree trunk and the cohesion-tension theory? It seems to be a recent favorite amongst the examiners. Thanks
ric
s
to say i fully comprehend this question would be an overstatement but what i can tell u is that u pretty much get it by elimination. the other choices sound absurs. antibodies are SPECIFIC to one antigen ! so an antibody complementary to antigen X will never stimulate an immune response to Y. that's pretty much what mr.examiner is trying to say by this seemingly complicated (but really not) questionurgent help for this one pleeeeeeeaaaaaseeeeeView attachment 12861
yea i guess elimination would be the only way....thanx fr yr helpto say i fully comprehend this question would be an overstatement but what i can tell u is that u pretty much get it by elimination. the other choices sound absurs. antibodies are SPECIFIC to one antigen ! so an antibody complementary to antigen X will never stimulate an immune response to Y. that's pretty much what mr.examiner is trying to say by this seemingly complicated (but really not) question
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now