• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

AS Biology P1 MCQs Preparation Thread

Nibz

XPRS Moderator
Messages
4,615
Reaction score
9,574
Points
523
just checked the er and it said vital capacity cannot increase, it's just the tidal vol that increases
That's what I said.

"For TIDAL VOLUME to increase, X and Y will have to decrease."
 
Messages
958
Reaction score
3,499
Points
253
Yes, that's how they are loaded at the source but the point is that the sources are the photosynthesising leaves, while the sinks are other parts of the plant, like the roots, storage organs. So, when the sugars are loaded into the sieve elements of the leaves, this means that there is more solute in the phloem sap. If you look at my answers above about solute potential is related to water potential, I have said solute potential is always negative, meaning more solute REDUCES/DECREASES water potential. The key here, to avoid confusion, is to understand that solute concentration is inversely proportional to water potential, and increasing it reduces water potential.
thanx, that really helped:)
 
Messages
958
Reaction score
3,499
Points
253
During excercise tidal volume increases and this will decrease Inspiratory Reserve Volume (i.e. the volume of air which u could inhale but dont) - in this case, volume X. Same goes for volume Y. Thing of Reserve Volumes as a Bank of air. When u excercise u take loans of air from ur reserve and this loan is what increases ur tidal volume. Oh and thanks for ur reply up there :)
that really helped, jazakallah:)
 
Messages
35
Reaction score
12
Points
18
can someone please answer my questionss
1) What to T killer and T helper cells do ?
2) does the loading of sucrose in the phloem seive tube require active transport? or massflow? :S
 

XPFMember

XPRS Moderator
Messages
4,555
Reaction score
13,290
Points
523
aoa

this one too....why wont it alter the active site shape?

9700 J\'11_13 Q 22.jpg
 
Messages
56
Reaction score
35
Points
28
If it's not too late does anybody understand the relationship between the girth (circumference) of a tree trunk and the cohesion-tension theory? It seems to be a recent favorite amongst the examiners. Thanks
 

Jaf

Messages
321
Reaction score
232
Points
53
help needed!!!!!! question 34, 38 and 40 of oct/nov/13/2010

34, fIrst you need to see that in sample 3, when uracil is 25, C is nil, which means C is THYMINE because the two are never found together. Once you have found that C is Thymine, whichever base is the same/nearly the same as C is adenine because, due to base pairing specificity, the two have to be equal. If you check, B is nearly the same as C in all cases and, so, the answer is B.

38, you may check above. I asked the same question on he last page, as 39 on paper 11, check the answer provided for that.

40, for this you need to understand basic mathematics. By mutipling the number of individuals with the biomass per individual, you will get the total biomass of the species in the ecosystem. When you multiply this by the energy per unit mass, you get the oral energy held by that species in the whOle foodchain. So,

Energy = number * mass per unit * energy per unit mass

Do that for Ll if them and you get:

P = 1000
Q = 100
R = 1.8
S = 450 000

In pyramids of energy, the species with most energy is at the base and those with the least are at the top. So, according to this, S should be at the base, followed by P and Q, and R at the top. This is only found in B so that's the answer.
 
Messages
958
Reaction score
3,499
Points
253
If it's not too late does anybody understand the relationship between the girth (circumference) of a tree trunk and the cohesion-tension theory? It seems to be a recent favorite amongst the examiners. Thanks
i think the circumference decreases as the cohesion-tension forces decreases
 
Messages
56
Reaction score
35
Points
28
urgent help for this one pleeeeeeeaaaaaseeeeeView attachment 12861
to say i fully comprehend this question would be an overstatement but what i can tell u is that u pretty much get it by elimination. the other choices sound absurs. antibodies are SPECIFIC to one antigen ! so an antibody complementary to antigen X will never stimulate an immune response to Y. that's pretty much what mr.examiner is trying to say by this seemingly complicated (but really not) question :)
 
Messages
958
Reaction score
3,499
Points
253
to say i fully comprehend this question would be an overstatement but what i can tell u is that u pretty much get it by elimination. the other choices sound absurs. antibodies are SPECIFIC to one antigen ! so an antibody complementary to antigen X will never stimulate an immune response to Y. that's pretty much what mr.examiner is trying to say by this seemingly complicated (but really not) question :)
yea i guess elimination would be the only way....thanx fr yr help:)
 
Top