Bio 42 2015!!!

[Jacqulene Preethi]

Was it Monohybrid or dihybrid cross (Q: 8) ?
Also the products of glycolysis, krebs cycle and oxidative phosphorylation other than ATP :
NADH and Pyruvate (glycolysis)
NADH and FADH2 (Krebs Cycle)
NAD, FAD and Water (Oxidative phosphorylation)
is it correct?

You had to conduct 2 monohybrid crosses

 

[Jacqulene Preethi]

No it asked with reference to graph about why they're genetically different. In last part they asked why they're different species and for that I wrote same too.

Yeah it was with reference to the graph. I wrote that they have different body mass and different rates of development/growth. Not sure if it's right though :/

 

[Balkhyyy]

Bio p5 was comparatively easy ryt?

I agree p4 was a mix of easy and hard. The thing is for bio p4 u dont have time to think and write so im sure many of us either missed out some point or some keyword or made silly mistakes.. So gt is very unpredictable
P5 was relatively easier. What do u expect the gt for p5? I havent seen any gt for p5 to be higher than 22

 

[anonymous1122]

I agree p4 was a mix of easy and hard. The thing is for bio p4 u dont have time to think and write so im sure many of us either missed out some point or some keyword or made silly mistakes.. So gt is very unpredictable
P5 was relatively easier. What do u expect the gt for p5? I havent seen any gt for p5 to be higher than 22

Not more than 24 i guess.

 

[princessnoor]

I agree p4 was a mix of easy and hard. The thing is for bio p4 u dont have time to think and write so im sure many of us either missed out some point or some keyword or made silly mistakes.. So gt is very unpredictable
P5 was relatively easier. What do u expect the gt for p5? I havent seen any gt for p5 to be higher than 22

Yh u r ryt i didnt had time to think and then answer
Gt of p5 would be around 20 i guess not less thn 20

 

[princessnoor]

Not more than 24 i guess.

24 is too high

 

[Princess Raven]

You had to conduct 2 monohybrid crosses

Wait didn't u only have to conduct the second generation??

 

[anonymous1122]

Wait didn't u only have to conduct the second generation??

We had to show both i guess

 

[anonymous1122]

24 is too high

It would be less than 24
I guess 21,22

 

[Princess Raven]

Why did they ask to draw a cross of the second generation only then?? If it was both they would have said first generation also.. I think it's only one cross

 

[anonymous1122]

Ahan i am not sure that they asked for second generation or both.
Showing both wont deduct marks anyways so alls well

Why did they ask to draw a cross of the second generation only then?? If it was both they would have said first generation also.. I think it's only one cross

 

[anonymous1122]

Since physics p2 was a bit tough i expect phy p4 would be a bit better
Something to be happy about.

 

[Jassim]

You would have to show two crosses, you might get marks for showing just one though

Why did they ask to draw a cross of the second generation only then?? If it was both they would have said first generation also.. I think it's only one cross

 

[princessnoor]

Since physics p2 was a bit tough i expect phy p4 would be a bit better
Something to be happy about.

Oh really ? Wht about p1 and p3?

 

[princessnoor]

Yea im preparihg for physics p4 now
I hve hope it will go good since gt for phy is usually low

 

[anonymous1122]

Oh really ? Wht about p1 and p3?

I dont know. P1 and p3 havent taken place yet.
But my friends who gave p2 today told me it wasnt that easy so fingers crossed for p4

 

[princessnoor]

Oh and guys wht do u think chem p5 would be easy or hard considering p4..?
I think it will be hard

 

[princessnoor]

I hope after phy p4 we all say it went awsome

 

[Omar Haider]

No, I think showing one cross was enough, because the question clearly specified to show the second generation.

 

[Rohan O]

We had to show only the SECOND generation as the question explicitly had mentioned to draw the second generation only.