so what were we supposed to write in the second point?yeah, i did the past papers before giving the paper, they accept either reversible competitive inhibition, reversible non-competitive inhibition or non-reversible non-competitive inhibition
We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
so what were we supposed to write in the second point?yeah, i did the past papers before giving the paper, they accept either reversible competitive inhibition, reversible non-competitive inhibition or non-reversible non-competitive inhibition
how many marks did it have?? 3 i guess, anyway you had to write the name and then 2 or 3 points about the features of the inhibition you named, such as where does the inhibitor fit, what change it brings about and how it effects the enzyme catalysed reaction.so what were we supposed to write in the second point?
ATP is for energy and energy is needed for growth, similarly phospholipids are needed for the cell surface membrane of newly formed cells (for growth), DNA is needed for cell replication (nuclear division) and RNA is needed for protein synthesis, and proteins are also required for growth.ATP is no way linked to growth the question asked what is the role of phospates in growth so synthesis of DNA/RNA with little explanation was enough
actually i dont knoware we suppose to write the term?. cant we just explain how it fits and inhibits??
i wrote -synthesis of ATPIn the last question of the paper, about phosphate ions i wrote the following 3 uses: synthesis of ATP, formation of phospholipids and synthesis of DNA/RNA. Then i vaguely linked them to growth
Basically they had asked about the uses of phosphate ions right??
this is exactly how it looked ^^View attachment 11769
I guess this was the photomicrograph of the plasma cell which was given. Either this or something very similar!
It was rough, although a lot of ppl wrote smooth as well.In the question which involved the labelling of the photomicrograph,was the endoplasmic reticulum rough or smooth? :S
nucleus, mitochondrion and rough endoplasmic reticulum.ohh god! the figure was too confusing. what did u guys labbelled??
View attachment 11769
I guess this was the photomicrograph of the plasma cell which was given. Either this or something very similar!
it is simply the SAME EXACTLY
I thought so too, i found this from google images, although there were many photomicrographs of plasma cells, I immediately recognized this one as the one given in our paper.this is exactly how it looked ^^
Yes, it was difficult to distinguish it as either RER or SER, but it was RER since they had asked about the structure's importance to specific role of plasma cells. RER is required for synthesis of proteins and hence antibodies, since antibodies are (glyco)proteins. SER has no importance to the specific role of plasma cells.How was it rough? :/ It looked smooth
alrite. And i wrote DNA and not nucleus , do u think they'll give marks on that??nucleus, mitochondrion and rough endoplasmic reticulum.
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now