• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

can any one please help me with this phy p4 question

Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Points
0
i dnt know wat is the logic behind filling this table
 

Attachments

  • graph.png
    graph.png
    37.9 KB · Views: 132
  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    28.9 KB · Views: 133
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Work done on the gas= Pressure* change in volume
u can use this formula to get the work done on the gas ... remember it is work done on the gas
and
for internal energy u can use
u=q+w
 
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Points
0
i cud get for the work done on gas from P ---> Q its 240J.....But i dnt get it for R ----> P
 
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Points
0
i still don't get it. the mark scheme for this question (9702_w10_ms_41) is quite wierd. the table for heating in ms and heat supplied to gas in qp is confusing me??
_
 
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Points
0
This is what i did
hope this helps:

from P---Q the work done was already calculated in (ii) so its 240J
so according to the formula Increase in internal energy=work done + heat supplied
so for P----Q Increase in I.E (u) is 240 (the work done) - 600 (the heat supplied) = -360 (internal energy)
from Q----R the increase in internal energy is 0 (work done) + 720 (heat supplied)= 720
from R-----P the Internal energy stays the same at the end cuz the total energy will be zero so it remains as -360 (from P---Q) the work done can be calculated:
workdone=increase in I.E - heat supplied
so WD= -360 - 480 = -840
I checked wid some teachers they said it was correct.

the marking scheme has different answers but the values for heating supplied are also different.
 
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Points
0
usamah2702 thnx....but the mark scheme has very different answers....its jst confusing.....!!
 
Messages
286
Reaction score
228
Points
0
The mark scheme is just plain wrong! However, the mark scheme does demonstrate that the net work done is 0.
 
Top