Chemistry P41 How was it?

[xtremeforums]

Expected gt?

 

[Thampi4]

It was awesome

I say 60+

 

[xtremeforums]

gt would defs be between 50-70.

Thats a very wide range
I say it would be around 60...

 

[Thampi4]

Yea

 

[iKhaled]

Yup, the gt would be around the same range that it has been around the last few years. If not higher, I don't know.
This paper was easier compared to last years- no NMR, mass spectroscopy. But still some parts were VERY tricky and carried a lot of marks,

i found the whole paper was tricky to be honest!!

 

[railey]

I have done so many silly mistakes in this paper.

 

[geek101]

I say it would be around 60...

Agreed

 

[roadtrip9o9]

afsos tab hota hai , jab parh k bhi lagte hain!

 

[Thampi4]

Probs the very high 60s.

The maximum must be 67 at beat for gt

 

[Adorkableme]

it was great, probably the easiest paper in years...no enthalpy, no moles...and no NMR man I do not like that topic
Expect the GT to be 60+

 

[Thampi4]

it was great, probably the easiest paper in years...no enthalpy, no moles...and no NMR man I do not like that topic
Expect the GT to be 60+

Same here
Pm me to discuss answers

 

[vivo990]

GT around 55. It seems easy, but actually is somehow tricky in some parts.

 

[studiesloverguider]

GT around 55. It seems easy, but actually is somehow tricky in some parts.

ALLAH TAA'LA AAP KI ZABAN MUBARAK KARE....... INSHALLAH THIS WILL BE THE GT...

 

[queen of the legend]

what was the Kc vlaue ??

 

[marz_katy]

what was the Kc vlaue ??

i got 50!! wbu?

 

[vivo990]

Well, many people I've seen got 25. Still trying to figure out what reasoning did they approach.
My Kc was 2.5x10^9. Did anyone get that value also? Or did anyone know somebody got that value?

 

[Omar99]

Well, many people I've seen got 25. Still trying to figure out what reasoning did they approach.
My Kc was 2.5x10^9. Did anyone get that value also? Or did anyone know somebody got that value?

What was your fe^2* value of con centration, was it same for that of fe^3+ given in the question. And how did u get the answer for this part??
What about the rate question what did get for the order of reaction of hcl.

 

[1357913579]

What was your fe^2* value of con centration, was it same for that of fe^3+ given in the question. And how did u get the answer for this part??
What about the rate question what did get for the order of reaction of hcl.

ws ur answer k=25?
becuase that is what i got

 

[vivo990]

What was your fe^2* value of con centration, was it same for that of fe^3+ given in the question. And how did u get the answer for this part??
What about the rate question what did get for the order of reaction of hcl.

No, it's not the same as fe3+,

[Fe3+]=[I-]. And [Fe2+]= 2[I2]

I used mole ratio between reactants. And mole ratio between products.

 

[1357913579]

No, it's not the same as fe3+,

[Fe3+]=[I-]. And [Fe2+]= 2[I2]

I used mole ratio between reactants. And mole ratio between products.

bro it is the same becuse yo dont see the overall equaton see the individual half equation hence 1:1