- Messages
- 347
- Reaction score
- 17
- Points
- 28
umm so if formation of bonds is exothermic.shouldnt the minus signs multiply to become positive?= Bond Energy Of Reactants - Bond Energy Of Products
We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
umm so if formation of bonds is exothermic.shouldnt the minus signs multiply to become positive?= Bond Energy Of Reactants - Bond Energy Of Products
= Bond Energy Of Reactants - Bond Energy Of Products
You guys seem to be using a different method to the one I usually use. I don't think I do it the way CIE says you're supposed to. I learnt how to do all my chemistry calculations from Jim Clark's book. He gives a little introduction to it on his website, maybe this'll help clear things up for you? http://www.chemguide.co.uk/physical/energetics/bondenthalpies.htmlPlease explain the times when the MS gives Products - Reactants instead, because the Examiner uses both.
Actually, sulfur forms a double bond. In double bond, you add 2 electrons (as opposed to adding 1 in a single bond, I forgot to mention that sorry). So sulfur has 6, each oxygen has 2 making a total of 10 electrons. Now, in each double bond, 4 electrons will be used leaving 2 behind. These 2 form a lone pair of sulfur.
Likewise, if you have a triple bond, then you add 3 electrons instead of 2. But very few questions come when you determine the shape of a molecule with a triple bond.
Also, when you have an ion like NH4+. You treat the + as a loss of electron. So for example, Nitrogen has 5, each hydrogen has 4 which means 9, but an electron is lost so there's 8. The rest of the shape is determined the same way.
umm so if formation of bonds is exothermic.shouldnt the minus signs multiply to become positive?
When they ask u to calculate the regular enthalpy change without using bond energies use this formula: AH of products- AH of reactants. And when they ask u to take enthalpy change out by using the bond energies then u use this formula= AH of Bond breaking( reactants) - AH of bond making (products)
its something like energy absorbed in bond breaking - energy released in bond forming . . dont know exact ..= Bond Energy Of Reactants - Bond Energy Of Products
the said in the question its iodine atoms, i did the same mistake...October November 2009, Paper 5, Question 2 (b) (i)
We have to calculate the moles for the Iodine reacted. It should have been simple, except that the Mark Scheme says that using the Mr for Iodine, i.e 254, instead of 127 is incorrect.
Why?
For diatomic molecules, we use the Mr, which is twice that of the Ar. But why do we do the other way round here?
Can someone please please explain to me instantaneous dipole - induced dipole and permanent dipole-dipole forces please explain how do we identify the compounds which has either of the two forces of attraction like how do we know when a compound has permanent or induced dipole? I'm soo lost when it comes to this and also how do we know if a compound is polar or not from its shape? I dont understand any of this please help
http://www.xtremepapers.com/papers/CIE/Cambridge International A and AS Level/Chemistry (9701)/9701_w10_qp_21.pdf
Q1c(iv) why is it 20cm^3? :S
can anyone plzzz explain hw am i supposd to get the rfm of the salts in Q1 C II??
http://www.xtremepapers.com/papers/CIE/Cambridge International A and AS Level/Chemistry (9701)/9701_s06_qp_2.pdf
It forms a double bond with both..Shouldn't So2 form double bonds with both the oxygen molecules so that both the oxygen and S get stable. Why does it form one double bond with one oxygen and a single bond with the other oxygen??
To add on, how does one identify as the grey/green residue in part (iii)?well, you already know the formula of the salts from the previous part. FeSO4 and (NH4)2SO4
just calculate the MR
FeSO4= 55.8+ 32.1+ 16*4 = 151.9
and (NH4)2SO4= 14*2+ 4*2+ 32.1+16*4 = 132.1
To add on, how does one identify as the grey/green residue in part (iii)?
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now