• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Chemistry: Post your doubts here!

Messages
1,857
Reaction score
2,374
Points
273
Can somebody confirm if I'm right:
1 (a) What is the electronic configuration of a nickel atom?
My answer: 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 4s2 3d8

(b) Predict the electronic configuration of a nickel (II) ion.
My answer: 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 4s2 3d6
 
Messages
65
Reaction score
6
Points
8
Can somebody confirm if I'm right:
1 (a) What is the electronic configuration of a nickel atom?
My answer: 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 4s2 3d8

(b) Predict the electronic configuration of a nickel (II) ion.
My answer: 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 4s2 3d6

Yes, that's correct.. heheh.. :)
 
Messages
118
Reaction score
30
Points
28
Can somebody confirm if I'm right:
1 (a) What is the electronic configuration of a nickel atom?
My answer: 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 4s2 3d8

(b) Predict the electronic configuration of a nickel (II) ion.
My answer: 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 4s2 3d6
Well the configuration for nickel atom is right...but for the nickel ion is wrong. The 2 electrons are removed from 4s as 4s has lower ionisation energy than 3d.
For ion, the e.c. should be : 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 3d8
 
Messages
118
Reaction score
30
Points
28
Anonymous...i think u need to recheck that. I'm sure the e.c. for the nickel ion is wrong.
 
Messages
118
Reaction score
30
Points
28
Answer should be A because oxidation number decreases from 5-3 , 3-2 , 2-1 , 1-0
So biggest decrease is in A...from NO3- to NO2-
 
Messages
118
Reaction score
30
Points
28
oh btw... in NO3- , N will have oxidation state of +5, because overall oxidation state of molecule should be -1.
+5-6 = -1
Same will be the case for NO2-
 
Messages
1,857
Reaction score
2,374
Points
273
Oh yeah! my bad, hehe.. yes yes, you're right, sorry.. I totally forgot about that.. heheh.. :giggle:
Thank you all. :)
But I'm still doubtful whether 3d is found slightly above 4s. Even if this is so, 3d, 3p & 3s are found in quantum level n=3. That is why i removed electrons from 3d first (farther from the nucleus, so lower ionisation energy.) I'm I right?
 
Messages
118
Reaction score
30
Points
28
well thats actually wrong...3d is closer to the nucleus than 4s...though it defies logic :p
But i guess at the end of the day, we all just have to remember that 3d is closer to nucleus than 4s. Since 4s is outermost in Nickel, shielding (screening) effect of inner electrons means that they will have least attraction to nucleus. N thats why they'll be removed first.
Crazy ain't it? :D
 
Messages
1,857
Reaction score
2,374
Points
273
well thats actually wrong...3d is closer to the nucleus than 4s...though it defies logic :p
But i guess at the end of the day, we all just have to remember that 3d is closer to nucleus than 4s. Since 4s is outermost in Nickel, shielding (screening) effect of inner electrons means that they will have least attraction to nucleus. N thats why they'll be removed first.
Crazy ain't it? :D
Yeah indeed!. Thank you!! ;)
 
Top