- Messages
- 402
- Reaction score
- 262
- Points
- 73
because this is a general rule that quantity doesn't get affected if the maximum price imposed is greater than the equilibrium price. Maximum price should always be lower than the equilibrium price.
We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
Hey guys I'm appearing for A2 business studies and I really need some help as I'm a bit confused on how to answer questions under Analyse/discuss/evaluate
At the moment I'm doing this question 'analyse the opportunities and threats of a global recession for ASC [10]
1) DEFNITION OF GLOBAL RECESSION
2) POINT ON OPPORTUNITY AND ITS negative n positive IMPACT ON THE BUSINESS
3) SAME WIH THE THREATS
Can anybody tell me where I'm gong worng! It'll be highly appreciated
the answer is c because if u look at the diagram ,at price p1 government could buy from x to y but an increase in price (minimum price as the line is above the equilibrium) so at p2 the government can buy from xzI need help with Question 16 in the paper attached below. The answer is C) XZ Why is this? I always choose YZ because of the distance from equiloibrium where D=S at Y. I always get these sort of questions wrong why is this? http://www.xtremepapers.com/papers/CIE/Cambridge International A and AS Level/Economics (9708)/9708_w09_qp_12.pdf
For Q7, you see first where the equilibrium was established before the implementation of the tax. Where D = S right? And that is at $16. Now see where the equilibrium is after the implementation of tax, where the new S = D, i.e. at $19. So, the tax implemented would be the difference in prices, that is, $3. Option C is correct!I need help with questions 7 & 8
http://www.xtremepapers.com/papers/CIE/Cambridge International A and AS Level/Economics (9708)/9708_s09_qp_1.pdf
TIA
Q8 calls for the definition of Unit Price Elasticity of demand. This means that an increase in price causes the quantity demanded to decrease by the same percentage. Like, if price increases by 1% then Qd decreases by 1%. Now, total revenue/expenditure on the product = Price X Quantity. Since the change in price cancels out the change in Quantity demanded, the expenditure remains constant. Hence the correct answer would be C.I need help with questions 7 & 8
http://www.xtremepapers.com/papers/CIE/Cambridge International A and AS Level/Economics (9708)/9708_s09_qp_1.pdf
TIA
omg thank you why didn't i see it like thatthe answer is c because if u look at the diagram ,at price p1 government could buy from x to y but an increase in price (minimum price as the line is above the equilibrium) so at p2 the government can buy from xz
hope u understand
Thank you!For Q7, you see first where the equilibrium was established before the implementation of the tax. Where D = S right? And that is at $16. Now see where the equilibrium is after the implementation of tax, where the new S = D, i.e. at $19. So, the tax implemented would be the difference in prices, that is, $3. Option C is correct!
thank you againQ8 calls for the definition of Unit Price Elasticity of demand. This means that an increase in price causes the quantity demanded to decrease by the same percentage. Like, if price increases by 1% then Qd decreases by 1%. Now, total revenue/expenditure on the product = Price X Quantity. Since the change in price cancels out the change in Quantity demanded, the expenditure remains constant. Hence the correct answer would be C.
I think it would be easier if you attached the papers as wellsalam
can someone explain me the following questions? All of them are of Economics AS Level paper 1
Are you sure you mentioned the doubts for Q30. Because Q30 does not ask for any selling out of currency.I don't understand Q30 http://www.xtremepapers.com/papers/CIE/Cambridge International A and AS Level/Economics (9708)/9708_s07_qp_1.pdf
If there is excess supply at $2.5 per pound then wouldn't it mean the government would have sold it's Pound?
Answer is A, why not C?
TIA
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now