• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Economics, Accounting & Business: Post your doubts here!

Messages
1,080
Reaction score
3,160
Points
273
u have the redspot book for econ?
q-17 if u apply what u said the answer should be C, but ms says its A
do u have any notes for q-19 i need help in this area
what notes are you talking about?
 
Messages
886
Reaction score
1,252
Points
153
u have the redspot book for econ?
q-17 if u apply what u said the answer should be C, but ms says its A
do u have any notes for q-19 i need help in this area
what notes are you talking about?
q 17no dude increase in supply means shifting right so it is A :)
 
Messages
886
Reaction score
1,252
Points
153
u have the redspot book for econ?
q-17 if u apply what u said the answer should be C, but ms says its A
do u have any notes for q-19 i need help in this area
what notes are you talking about?
even i need to check notes ....google and notes appear :D datz hw i get notes :D
 
Messages
886
Reaction score
1,252
Points
153
upload_2014-3-23_18-34-16-png.37524

how to get B ?
 
Messages
347
Reaction score
520
Points
73
upload_2014-3-23_18-34-16-png.37524

how to get B ?
MPC of unemployed is higher, let say 0.7.
MPC of tax payers is lower than that of unemployed, let say 0.5

Government is increasing the expenditure on unemployment benefits by $10 million, this means that now, the unemployed individuals would have more money to consume. However, at the same time, taxation should rise by greater amount than $10 million if government wants to keep the A.E unchanged. Because suppose that first, the taxpayers were paying 0.2 of their income as taxes (MPT = o.2) Now, if the taxes are increased by greater proportion, the MPC of taxpayers would fall, means that they would now consume less. The fall in consumption of the tax payers should be equal to an increase in consumption by unemployed individuals. However, the MPC of both are different and therefore the taxes should be increased by MORE than $10 million if the A.E is to be kept constant.
 
Messages
886
Reaction score
1,252
Points
153
MPC of unemployed is higher, let say 0.7.
MPC of tax payers is lower than that of unemployed, let say 0.5

Government is increasing the expenditure on unemployment benefits by $10 million, this means that now, the unemployed individuals would have more money to consume. However, at the same time, taxation should rise by greater amount than $10 million if government wants to keep the A.E unchanged. Because suppose that first, the taxpayers were paying 0.2 of their income as taxes (MPT = o.2) Now, if the taxes are increased by greater proportion, the MPC of taxpayers would fall, means that they would now consume less. The fall in consumption of the tax payers should be equal to an increase in consumption by unemployed individuals. However, the MPC of both are different and therefore the taxes should be increased by MORE than $10 million if the A.E is to be kept constant.
jazakallah :) got it :)
 
Messages
1,080
Reaction score
3,160
Points
273
Im facing a huge problem can anyone help me pls
http://papers.xtremepapers.com/CIE/Cambridge International A and AS Level/Accounting (9706)/9706_s07_qp_2.pdf
Can ull give me the answer of B where the break even point shud be calculated in dollars
My answer is correct for household but not for Buisiness and factory

this is for business
break even point = fixed costs/ contribution per unit
contribution per unit=selling price-variable costs
selling price = 108000/900 =120
vc per unit = (45000+28800+13500)/900=97
therefore breakeven = 27000/(120-97)
=1174 units

1174 * 120 (selling price) = $140880 breakeven in value

do the same for factory!
 
Messages
1,328
Reaction score
3,317
Points
273
this is for business
break even point = fixed costs/ contribution per unit
contribution per unit=selling price-variable costs
selling price = 108000/900 =120
vc per unit = (45000+28800+13500)/900=97
therefore breakeven = 27000/(120-97)
=1174 units

1174 * 120 (selling price) = $140880 breakeven in value

do the same for factory!

is it ok if the answer differs by some few units?
 
Top