• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Economics, Accounting & Business: Post your doubts here!

Messages
553
Reaction score
1,080
Points
73
ZeoJxfn.png

The difference between the Net Assets taken over and the agreed price is the goodwill.. Do the same for Ronicus! i.e $15000
 
Messages
553
Reaction score
1,080
Points
73
Q17 = They sold for a profit, so we have to find the cost in order to reduce it from the cost of stock.
Therefore cost is = 15000/125*100 = 12000
Then Stock at 10 Jan = $104000
In sums like these you go backwards. So you add the stock that was sold and minus the stock that was purchased.
--> 104000+12000-16000 = $100000 = B

For Q28 you will have to try out all the given four scenarios to see what happens. Did you do that?
 
Messages
1,328
Reaction score
3,317
Points
273
Im taking Titus for this example.
The Total Assets of his business is (20+10) = $30000
They Agreed to transfer to the new business at $45000
So Goodwill = $45000 - $30000 = $15000

if u dnt mind can u do the capital account pls?
 
Messages
347
Reaction score
520
Points
73
View attachment 38688
oct/nov 2004 paper 3
how to do this
Answer = D but how o_O
This one sure is hard.
This one test the knowledge related to consumer and producer surplus. In case of labour market, labour is willing to work for any wage level below the supply curve. The wage rate is OW so the labour would work at any given point below the supply curve of labour as marked by area shaded with brown. The area marked with brown is the area labour would work at any given wage rate. Therefore we'd simply deduct x from z to get the final answer.
It's a bit hard to explain with simply words but if you don't, I'd try to explain again.
1.png
 
Messages
553
Reaction score
1,080
Points
73
This one sure is hard.
This one test the knowledge related to consumer and producer surplus. In case of labour market, labour is willing to work for any wage level below the supply curve. The wage rate is OW so the labour would work at any given point below the supply curve of labour as marked by area shaded with brown. The area marked with brown is the area labour would work at any given wage rate. Therefore we'd simply deduct x from z to get the final answer.
It's a bit hard to explain with simply words but if you don't, I'd try to explain again.
View attachment 38690
Well my theory was somewhat different. The minimum amount the worker is paid per week is below the supply curve, and what i deduced from the diagram was that it is X since he is required to work a standard 40-hour week.
And since the total amount he is paid per week is Z, the difference therefore would be Z-X.

Not sure though :/
 
Messages
99
Reaction score
119
Points
43
Can someone please help me out how briefly to go about the following questions-
(a) Explain why all types of economic system benefit from the existence and use of money. [8]
(b) Discuss whether an economy’s production possibility curve is more likely to move inward or outward over time. [12]

Explain the characteristics required by money if it is to carry out its functions effectively. [8]
 
Messages
886
Reaction score
1,252
Points
153
This one sure is hard.
This one test the knowledge related to consumer and producer surplus. In case of labour market, labour is willing to work for any wage level below the supply curve. The wage rate is OW so the labour would work at any given point below the supply curve of labour as marked by area shaded with brown. The area marked with brown is the area labour would work at any given wage rate. Therefore we'd simply deduct x from z to get the final answer.
It's a bit hard to explain with simply words but if you don't, I'd try to explain again.
View attachment 38690
can u explain again pls o_O .. i dint get it ...
 
Top