- Messages
- 553
- Reaction score
- 1,080
- Points
- 73
Whats the year? It goes like 96000 represents 125% therefore cost is 76800!View attachment 39425
how is the answer C - when i do for sales adjusting for cost i get 76800 but it should be 72000 .. ??
We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
Whats the year? It goes like 96000 represents 125% therefore cost is 76800!View attachment 39425
how is the answer C - when i do for sales adjusting for cost i get 76800 but it should be 72000 .. ??
2002 ppr 1 may june and answer is CWhats the year? It goes like 96000 represents 125% therefore cost is 76800!
Right. Foget what i said earlier. Here it goes:2002 ppr 1 may june and answer is C
What are the changes in company accounts new format of AS Accounting?
Q21 - Answer is D. This is just a matter of substituting formulas.
Since its a closed economy, Y = C + I
The formula for C is what they hav given = 30 + 0.8Y
I = 50
Jus substitute them into Y = C + I
Which will be Y = (30+0.8Y) + 50
Solve that and you will get Y = 400
Q22 - Its A. Because, Bond prices and interest rates go in opposite directions. Therefore, When interest falls, people will hold more idle balances as returns on speculative transactions is lower.
Q23 - Its C. Because, Advances in technology causes investment to rise. When investments rise, demand for loans rise, hence, the demand increases..
A reduction in marginal propensity to save means people will be saving less, as a result of which banks will now have less money to lend, hence the supply falls.
Q25 - Its C because as spending in an economy rises due to expansionary fiscal policy, a fixed money supply would mean that the increase in demand for money from the increased spending exceeds the supply of money available in the economy hence interest rates rise, which is a contractionary monetary policy itself which results in the expansionary policy being rather ineffective.
Jazakallahu khair guys!Q 30 C because in slump there will be Budget Deficit hence increase taxes to make it balanced budget
and lower taxes in boom because in boom there will be more revenue and less expenditure so lowering taxes will decrease govt revenue and maintainin balanced budget
bro q23 can u explain what will happen to the curves if options a,b or d take place, i just want to understand the conceptQ21 - Answer is D. This is just a matter of substituting formulas.
Since its a closed economy, Y = C + I
The formula for C is what they hav given = 30 + 0.8Y
I = 50
Jus substitute them into Y = C + I
Which will be Y = (30+0.8Y) + 50
Solve that and you will get Y = 400
Q22 - Its A. Because, Bond prices and interest rates go in opposite directions. Therefore, When interest falls, people will hold more idle balances as returns on speculative transactions is lower.
Q23 - Its C. Because, Advances in technology causes investment to rise. When investments rise, demand for loans rise, hence, the demand increases..
A reduction in marginal propensity to save means people will be saving less, as a result of which banks will now have less money to lend, hence the supply falls.
Q25 - Its C because as spending in an economy rises due to expansionary fiscal policy, a fixed money supply would mean that the increase in demand for money from the increased spending exceeds the supply of money available in the economy hence interest rates rise, which is a contractionary monetary policy itself which results in the expansionary policy being rather ineffective.
Actually, in my diagram, I've taken into consideration aggregate demand as a whole. However in mcq no 21, they've just considered consumption.TheZodiac bro could u explain this diagram? i couldnt understand them (your notes)
a similar question in pastpaper -
http://papers.xtremepapers.com/CIE/Cambridge International A and AS Level/Economics (9708)/9708_s08_qp_3.pdf
q21
http://papers.xtremepapers.com/CIE/Cambridge International A and AS Level/Economics (9708)/9708_s09_qp_3.pdf
q18
Similarly in Q18 Answer should be C.TheZodiac bro could u explain this diagram? i couldnt understand them (your notes)
a similar question in pastpaper -
http://papers.xtremepapers.com/CIE/Cambridge International A and AS Level/Economics (9708)/9708_s08_qp_3.pdf
q21
http://papers.xtremepapers.com/CIE/Cambridge International A and AS Level/Economics (9708)/9708_s09_qp_3.pdf
q18
Thank you... Can u further tell me what is the change in that part?The dividends part you do it in the statement of equity
This is a tough one.
Jazakallah!This is a tough one.
I applied Sherlock Holmes approach on this one. We know for sure that A and D cannot be the answer. If birth rate increases, the income growth per head would fall. If government increases its defence spending, than too the income growth per head would not increase as there would exist unemployment because lack of investment.
B and C are left. Now according to me, imports would have little effect in long run upon the growth of income per head where as if people start to save, there would be more leakage in an economy. As it's developing economy, government would have to invest and this would create job opportunities for individuals. Thus in the long run, it would result in increased income per head.
Thank you... Can u further tell me what is the change in that part?
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now