- Messages
- 278
- Reaction score
- 30
- Points
- 38
AND SOMONE SAID HERE THAT ADMISSION AND RETIREMENT OF PARTNERS IS ALSO IN THE SYLLABUS OF P2....I AGREE BUT I THINK IT IS HIGHLY UNLIKELY TO COME IN P2........
RIGHT???
RIGHT???
We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
AND SOMONE SAID HERE THAT ADMISSION AND RETIREMENT OF PARTNERS IS ALSO IN THE SYLLABUS OF P2....I AGREE BUT I THINK IT IS HIGHLY UNLIKELY TO COME IN P2........
RIGHT???
YEAH YOU ARE RIGHT BUT......I DONT THINK IT'S GONNA COMEacoouns right ? yea even i think its unlikely but to be on the safer side make sure you know it. cuz you never whats gonna come in the ppr, so better safe than sorry.
YEAH YOU ARE RIGHT BUT......I DONT THINK IT'S GONNA COME
YEAH YOU ARE RIGHT BUT......I DONT THINK IT'S GONNA COME
question 28, the marginal and abosrption question!Costing as in?? what was the question exactly??
i really hope dey ask BEP n marginal......m so tensedI AM NOT SURE WHAT IS GONNA COME OR NOT.......
BUT I THINK THAT PARTNERSHIP AND BREAK EVEN MAY COME........PERHAPS....JUST A GUESS
question 28, the marginal and abosrption question!
guys, plz help.. i want to check my answers, i need the correct answers :S
oh that one.... its absorption ,marginal (b) i guessquestion 28, the marginal and abosrption question!
guys, plz help.. i want to check my answers, i need the correct answers :S
well according to me it was A.
absorption in valuing inventory because it would allow a more realistic estimate as it considers fixed overhead cost in closing inventories. As the goods were being sold below selling price, the firm would again use absorption costing because its now selling good below the price and need to cover fixed expenditure and so will add it in the price. if the firm used marginal costing approach, it would not consider fixed cost and contribution earned will be low
NO IT WAS .....ABSORPTION AND THEN MARGINAL
I am not sure abt it...bt I think the second one is marginal. Even if a business is selling below the price it will continue till it has a positive contribution. This can be analysed only through marginal costing. I may be wrong..bt this is wat i understood.well according to me it was A.
absorption in valuing inventory because it would allow a more realistic estimate as it considers fixed overhead cost in closing inventories. As the goods were being sold below selling price, the firm would again use absorption costing because its now selling good below the price and need to cover fixed expenditure and so will add it in the price. if the firm used marginal costing approach, it would not consider fixed cost and contribution earned will be low
I am not sure abt it...bt I think the second one is marginal. Even if a business is selling below the price it will continue till it has a positive contribution. This can be analysed only through marginal costing. I may be wrong..bt this is wat i understood.
Going through the past papers i noticed that every year has the accounting stuffs and questions in the d, e parts are mostly related to motivations, marketing, stock control and HRM.HELLO..........CAN ANYONE TELL ME WHAT ALL DO I NEED TO CONCENTRATE FOR TOMORROW'S BS PAPER 2???ANY GUESSES OR IMP TOPICs?HELP
I might not have the exact logic behind it...bt i knw that the absorption,marginal. is the correct answer. i had read it.then the firm will not sell below the selling price. if it could make a profit on selling price then why charge a low price. never mind, that question was confusing
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now