- Messages
- 764
- Reaction score
- 752
- Points
- 103
Thankkkkk Allah k I have so many days to prepare for a levels ie ppr 3! 7th of June on ma birthday
id b giving a ppr!:/
id b giving a ppr!:/
We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
I think that we took in business, that it can be for direct labour hours as well...no of employees. i guess
Profit. You weren't supposed to charge depreciation on buildings.in the income account of first question .........wether there was a profit or a loss?
You were supposed to apportion them on the basis of no of employees, because the direct labour hours are only concerned with the direct labour. These were indirect wages.I think that we took in business, that it can be for direct labour hours as well...
hours worked by an employee, decides his wage? time rate wage??
are u sure about the buildings? no depreciation for it?The paper was probably the easiest in history
Profit. You weren't supposed to charge depreciation on buildings.
You were supposed to apportion them on the basis of no of employees, because the direct labour hours are only concerned with the direct labour. These were indirect wages.
nop no deprn is to be provided for buildingare u sure about the buildings? no depreciation for it?
ur kidding ?well m happy nw....readin all dat wt is discussed so far m soooo relaxed nw .....
hehehhehe i hpe i m as wen d esults cm....i hpe i gt an A in all.....god bless us allur kidding ?
yup! ur kidding! i'm dying here :S
yeah hope so i need that A very much to a level u cant imaginehehehhehe i hpe i m as wen d esults cm....i hpe i gt an A in all.....god bless us all
the additional information said : depreciation is to be provided on non-current assets using a rate of 20% by the reducing balance method...nop no deprn is to be provided for building
btw, i'm still worried about the depreciation and not 100% convinced that its right :S may god be with us :/i ws so confused abt deprn i dint tk it bt my frnds did n i ws lyk omg did i mk a mistk????
even I !!!!!yeah hope so i need that A very much to a level u cant imagine
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now