History Full Length Answers !!!!

[starship]

thanks A lot really helped

Quetion: Why did Jinnah produced his 14 points in 1929? [7] [/B]
Answer: Muhammad Ali Jinnah produced his 14 points in response to the crisis over the Nehru Report of 1928. It was also a golden opportunity for the Quaid to set his demands.
The main objectives of the Nehru Report were to threaten the Muslim interest like they recommended in Nehru Report that no separate electorate for the Muslims, no one-third in the central assembly, no reservation of seats for the Muslims in Punjab and Bengal. Thus the Nehru Report was nothing else then the Congress document and thus totally opposed by Muslims of the sub-continent.
The Hindus under Congress threatened the Government with a disobedience movement if the Nehru report was not implemented into the act by December 31, 1929. This Hindu attitude proved to be a milestone in the freedom movement of the Muslims. It also proved to be a turning point in the life of Muhammad Ali Jinnah. After reading the Nehru Report Quaid-e-Azam tried to get amendments in the Nehru Report in All Party conference in Calcutta, but he did not succeeded. This was the very moment when Jinnah announced a ‘Parting of the ways’. The Muslims wanted a separate homeland as they were different from the Hindus culturally; religiously and politically therefore, in March 1929 Quaid-e-Azam compiled a set of recommendations that greatly influenced Muslim thinking for a better part of the next decade. So in his 14 points Jinnah stated that the safe guard and protection for the rights and interests of the Muslims must be given, the demand of federal form of Government, provincial autonomy, protection of minorities, separate electorates, religious freedom to all and one-third seats for all Muslims and it further demanded that Sind must be separated from Bombay and full provincial status must be given to N.W.F.P and Baluchistan.
These 14 points set out the demands of the Muslims for any future negotiation with either Congress or the British. These 14 points became inspiration for the Muslims of the sub-continent because it convinced that the Hindus and the Muslims were two separate nations.
Q6: The Khilafat Movement was organized by the Ali brothers- Mohammed Ali and Shaukat Ali in protest against the injustices done to Turkey (which had fought against Britain) after the First World War. Turkey was important to the Indian Muslims as the Sultan of Turkey was also the ‘Caliph’ (or Khalifa) and was the head of the Muslims throughout the world. The Khilafat leaders put pressure upon the British government to give better treatment to Turkey. Through this demand, Muslims were drawn into the national movement in large numbers. The movement become a part of the national movement. The Congress leaders joined in the agitation and helped in organizing it throughout the country.The khilafat Movement was launched in 1919 and ended in 1924. Khilaft Movement was flat lined by Hijrat Movement which was declaired by the Molvi brothers and destroyed the Muslims.
A tragic offshoot of the Khilafat Movement was the Hijrat Movement proposed by Jamiyat-al-Ulema-i-Hind. When a land is not safe for Islam, a Muslim has two options; Jihad or Hijrat. Around 925 eminent Muslims signed this fatwa. According to one version, the idea of Hijrat was originated from Maulana Abul Kalam Azad. Muslim opposed this especially to M.A Jinnah the Muslim leader wanted the Muslims to stay and fight for their cause but In the North West Frontier Province and Sindh, hundreds of families sold their land and property and departed in the direction of the Khyber Pass, to migrate to Afghanistan, a brotherly independent Muslim state. In the month of August alone, some 18,000 Indian Muslims migrated to Afghanistan. Afghanistan, a poor country, was unable to absorb so large an influx of population and sealed its borders. It is difficult to establish who was responsible for misleading such a large number of Muslims.

Q10: Ramachandra Pandurang Tope (1814 - 1859), also known as Tatya Tope (pronounced Toh-pey), was an Indian leader in the Indian Rebellion of 1857. Born in village Yeola in Maharashtra, he was the only son of Pandurang Rao Tope and his wife Rukhmabai, an important noble at the court of the Maratha Peshwa Baji Rao II. His father shifted his family with the Peshwa to Bithur where his son became the most intimate friend of the Peshwa's adopted son, Nana Dhondu Pant (known as Nana Sahib) and Maharaja Madhav Singhji. In 1851, when Lord Dalhousie deprived Nana Sahib of his father's pension, Tatya Tope also became a sworn enemy of the British. In May 1857, when the political storm was gaining momentum, he won over the Indian troops of the East India Company, stationed at Kanpur (Cawnpore), established Nana Sahib's authority and became the Commander-in-Chief of his forces.

 

[Experienced One]

Q10: Ramachandra Pandurang Tope (1814 - 1859), also known as Tatya Tope (pronounced Toh-pey), was an Indian leader in the Indian Rebellion of 1857. Born in village Yeola in Maharashtra, he was the only son of Pandurang Rao Tope and his wife Rukhmabai, an important noble at the court of the Maratha Peshwa Baji Rao II. His father shifted his family with the Peshwa to Bithur where his son became the most intimate friend of the Peshwa's adopted son, Nana Dhondu Pant (known as Nana Sahib) and Maharaja Madhav Singhji. In 1851, when Lord Dalhousie deprived Nana Sahib of his father's pension, Tatya Tope also became a sworn enemy of the British. In May 1857, when the political storm was gaining momentum, he won over the Indian troops of the East India Company, stationed at Kanpur (Cawnpore), established Nana Sahib's authority and became the Commander-in-Chief of his forces.

can this come ???
i mean it's no where in the book

 

[younus aqueel]

Please post 4 mark questions list sec1&2 with answers .,.

 

[Irfan Atique]

can this come ???
i mean it's no where in the book

The question is from history topics and books aint enough you have to do some research

 

[Experienced One]

The question is from history topics and books aint enough you have to do some research

oh okay =(
acha can u ans these:

1. comparison of partition of Bengal wid it's reversal
   eg. reason for partitioning bengal were more imp than those that caused its reversal? do u agree? exp ur ans
2. a) was promotion of urdu more imp than promotion of other/regional languages between 1947-1999
   b) ‘The development of Pushto has been promoted more than any other Pakistani regional language between 1947 and 1988.’
   c) How important was the development of regional languages to Pakistan between 1947 and 1988? Explain your answer. [14]
3. what were the constitutional reforms from the beginning of British rule till independence

i dont exactly remember the question 3, sir junaid took our mock ques paper it had this ques, but it's meaning was this only

 

[Irfan Atique]

oh okay =(
acha can u ans these:

1. comparison of partition of Bengal wid it's reversal
   eg. reason for partitioning bengal were more imp than those that caused its reversal? do u agree? exp ur ans
2. a) was promotion of urdu more imp than promotion of other/regional languages between 1947-1999
   b) ‘The development of Pushto has been promoted more than any other Pakistani regional language between 1947 and 1988.’
   c) How important was the development of regional languages to Pakistan between 1947 and 1988? Explain your answer. [14]
3. what were the constitutional reforms from the beginning of British rule till independence

i dont exactly remember the question 3, sir junaid took our mock ques paper it had this ques, but it's meaning was this only

sorry I want ans the guess questions

 

[Experienced One]

sorry I want ans the guess questions

okay

 

[Irfan Atique]

Are these points for the question "Why was the Khilafat Movement started?" correct?
-To protect the caliphate and the ottoman empire
-as a way if showing opposition to the British to remind them of their wartime promises.
-self rule and more indian representation inthe government.

Honestly I think that the first two points are correct, but the third point is invalid.
My teacher told me the third point and I know that it is incorrect but can anyone tell
me the correct point? Please help!

Question: Why khilaft moment was founded? [7[
Answer: The Khilafat Movement was organized by the Ali brothers- Mohammed Ali and Shaukat Ali in protest against the injustices done to Turkey (which had fought against Britain) after the First World War. Turkey was important to the Indian Muslims as the Sultan of Turkey was also the ‘Caliph’ (or Khalifa) and was the head of the Muslims throughout the world. The Khilafat leaders put pressure upon the British government to give better treatment to Turkey. Through this demand, Muslims were drawn into the national movement in large numbers. The movement become a part of the national movement. The Congress leaders joined in the agitation and helped in organizing it throughout the country.
Khilafat Movement was founded when the First World War started in 1914; Turkey which was the center of Islam fought by the side of Germany and the Ottoman Empire was to fight the alleys of British. The British government was to stern to keep the Muslims of India in control, so that the Muslims should not raise any voice in the support of khalifa.
As the World War 1 ended in 1918 the British decided to punish the Turkish was by the side of Germany and against British so the Indian Muslims are disturbed over the fate of Turkey as the Muslims thought that the Turkey would be split up and Muslims held the Caliphate of Turkey in high regard and they were not prepared to see Turkey spilt up after the War. They also desired that respectful approach be concluded between the British and Turkey but the British punished Turkey the Muslims of India organized a movement to put the pressure on British to respect their Promise who promised that no harm would be done to the caliphate but after the war ended the European suggested that the British and French wanted to punish the Turks for their Support for the Germans. As a result Muslims organized themselves under the leadership of Ali Brothers who formed an institution called the Khialft Movement. In this way Khilaft Movement was founded.

 

[Irfan Atique]

why was EIC abolished?
^please answer this one

Answer: The British government took control of the affairs of EIC in the early 19th century because of the worst treatment to the Indian people and as well as it was better For the British crown to run the profit properly rather than the private company (EIC) to run the country.
EIC was basically semi-government (private company). EIC after gaining control of Subcontinent give many problems to local people e.g. Annexations of the territories the introduction of advanced weapon introduction of study of Bible in school and their own huge some of trade. Another reason was the revolt of 1857 and they invest of EIC.
For the British government the subcontinent was too valuable and they were frightened of Russian advance from the North. The volume of trade become so significant that the British government felt it was too valuable and asset to leave in the hands of private company even though, the EIC was now holding it possession interest for them but the British government also feared of the Russian expansion in central Asia. So Britain decided to shape its foreign policy by further expansion to Afghanistan. To counter this threat as British was becoming more involved and her prestige began to beat stake and involved further expansion became inevitable especially after the defeat by the Afghanis at Kabul. Another factor was that the EIC was doing unjust with local people like during annexation of Bengal millions of people died during EIC was resounded in the British government had to react and took over EIC.

 

[Irfan Atique]

Can anyone please answer this question;
"Why did the British government take control of the affairs of India in the early nineteenth century?" [7]

Question: Why the British government take control of the affairs of EIC in the early 19th century? [7]
Answer: The British government took control of the affairs of EIC in the early 19th century because of the worst treatment to the Indian people and as well as it was better For the British crown to run the profit properly rather than the private company (EIC) to run the country.
EIC was basically semi-government (private company). EIC after gaining control of Subcontinent give many problems to local people e.g. Annexations of the territories the introduction of advanced weapon introduction of study of Bible in school and their own huge some of trade. Another reason was the revolt of 1857 and they invest of EIC.
For the British government the subcontinent was too valuable and they were frightened of Russian advance from the North. The volume of trade become so significant that the British government felt it was too valuable and asset to leave in the hands of private company even though, the EIC was now holding it possession interest for them but the British government also feared of the Russian expansion in central Asia. So Britain decided to shape its foreign policy by further expansion to Afghanistan. To counter this threat as British was becoming more involved and her prestige began to beat stake and involved further expansion became inevitable especially after the defeat by the Afghanis at Kabul. Another factor was that the EIC was doing unjust with local people like during annexation of Bengal millions of people died during EIC was resounded in the British government had to react and took over EIC.

 

[Irfan Atique]

Can anyone also answer this question?
" why did the Indian subcontinent attract the european traders?" [7]

Also, please, list down the three points for this answer. Thankyou in advance.

Answer:
Immense wealth and luxurious life of Indian princes was the main cause of attraction for the Europeans and also the British.
It is a country of fertile land and agricultural produce, mineral wealth and other natural resources. Since early history, it was attractive to invaders. Europe on the other hand has cold climate and lesser natural resources.
Since twelfth century, scientific development started in Europe which led to the development of weaponry. Gun powder started modern guns and cannons. These factors encouraged Europeans to invade and capture other fertile lands where the rulers were divided and disintegrated. The Europeans came to India for wealth but due to their lesser number and a strong system of kings in India, they could not gain political power. The stories of the luxurious life of Indian Nawabs and Rajas were known to Europeans. Their clothes, jewelry, immense wealth and luxury always attracted Europeans and they saw golden opportunities of business in India. The Portuguese, the Dutch, the French and finally the British tried their luck in India. Until the death of Aurangzeb, Mughals had become very weak and the EIC decided to take advantage of this weakness. Until, 1750, Mughals had lost their wealth as well as their prestige. Soon the British got involved in practical politics and captured India within hundred years.
East India Company also involved due to the competition and political rivalry with the other European nations. European nations were almost equal in technological development and they had captured the wealth-producing regions of the world. For this reason, when East India Company went to Indonesia, they were expelled by the Dutch. Even in India, the Emperor Jahangir did not permit them to trade but they were lucky that they were granted permission by the Prince Shah Jahan. There was a rivalry between the Europeans and they wanted to supersede each other. Besides that, the British had a strong government of Queen Victoria. They were rich, organized and advanced in technology but in India, they had competition with Portuguese, Dutch and later with the French. However they could not imagine in 1608 that they would become the rulers of India in hundred years.

 

[Umna.Asim]

Question: Why khilaft moment was founded? [7[
Answer: The Khilafat Movement was organized by the Ali brothers- Mohammed Ali and Shaukat Ali in protest against the injustices done to Turkey (which had fought against Britain) after the First World War. Turkey was important to the Indian Muslims as the Sultan of Turkey was also the ‘Caliph’ (or Khalifa) and was the head of the Muslims throughout the world. The Khilafat leaders put pressure upon the British government to give better treatment to Turkey. Through this demand, Muslims were drawn into the national movement in large numbers. The movement become a part of the national movement. The Congress leaders joined in the agitation and helped in organizing it throughout the country.
Khilafat Movement was founded when the First World War started in 1914; Turkey which was the center of Islam fought by the side of Germany and the Ottoman Empire was to fight the alleys of British. The British government was to stern to keep the Muslims of India in control, so that the Muslims should not raise any voice in the support of khalifa.
As the World War 1 ended in 1918 the British decided to punish the Turkish was by the side of Germany and against British so the Indian Muslims are disturbed over the fate of Turkey as the Muslims thought that the Turkey would be split up and Muslims held the Caliphate of Turkey in high regard and they were not prepared to see Turkey spilt up after the War. They also desired that respectful approach be concluded between the British and Turkey but the British punished Turkey the Muslims of India organized a movement to put the pressure on British to respect their Promise who promised that no harm would be done to the caliphate but after the war
ended the European suggested that the British and French wanted to punish the Turks for their Support for the Germans. As a result Muslims organized themselves under the leadership of Ali Brothers who formed an institution called the Khialft Movement. In this way Khilaft Movement was founded.

Thanks
If we look at the three points, they would be:
- Pressurizing the British to remin them of their wartime promises
-to save the Caliph and Ottoman Empire
- deep seated Muslim fears about how Muslim countries were treated in general.
Are these right?

 

[Umna.Asim]

Thankyouuu!
and these are the three points right?
- Due to Russian expansion the British government thought it was too risky to leave India in the hands of a Private company.
-War of Independence (1857)
-EIC was taking too much profit for themselves and by taking a direct control they wouldn't lose the valuable asset.

Question: Why the British government take control of the affairs of EIC in the early 19th century? [7]
Answer: The British government took control of the affairs of EIC in the early 19th century because of the worst treatment to the Indian people and as well as it was better For the British crown to run the profit properly rather than the private company (EIC) to run the country.
EIC was basically semi-government (private company). EIC after gaining control of Subcontinent give many problems to local people e.g. Annexations of the territories the introduction of advanced weapon introduction of study of Bible in school and their own huge some of trade. Another reason was the revolt of 1857 and they invest of EIC.
For the British government the subcontinent was too valuable and they were frightened of Russian advance from the North. The volume of trade become so significant that the British government felt it was too valuable and asset to leave in the hands of private company even though, the EIC was now holding it possession interest for them but the British government also feared of the Russian expansion in central Asia. So Britain decided to shape its foreign policy by further expansion to Afghanistan. To counter this threat as British was becoming more involved and her prestige began to beat stake and involved further expansion became inevitable especially after the defeat by the Afghanis at Kabul. Another factor was that the EIC was doing unjust with local people like during annexation of Bengal millions of people died during EIC was resounded in the British government had to react and took over EIC.

 

[Umna.Asim]

Thanks once again!
Sir, my teacher said that the three points for this would be
-profitable trade
-getting monopoly of trade in india by competing with other Europeans
-fear of Russian expansion.
Can you elaborate the third point? And in case you're wondering why I always write down the three points is because it helps me write the answer because I can then elaborate it easily. Anyways much much thanks for helping

Answer:
Immense wealth and luxurious life of Indian princes was the main cause of attraction for the Europeans and also the British.
It is a country of fertile land and agricultural produce, mineral wealth and other natural resources. Since early history, it was attractive to invaders. Europe on the other hand has cold climate and lesser natural resources.
Since twelfth century, scientific development started in Europe which led to the development of weaponry. Gun powder started modern guns and cannons. These factors encouraged Europeans to invade and capture other fertile lands where the rulers were divided and disintegrated. The Europeans came to India for wealth but due to their lesser number and a strong system of kings in India, they could not gain political power. The stories of the luxurious life of Indian Nawabs and Rajas were known to Europeans. Their clothes, jewelry, immense wealth and luxury always attracted Europeans and they saw golden opportunities of business in India. The Portuguese, the Dutch, the French and finally the British tried their luck in India. Until the death of Aurangzeb, Mughals had become very weak and the EIC decided to take advantage of this weakness. Until, 1750, Mughals had lost their wealth as well as their prestige. Soon the British got involved in practical politics and captured India within hundred years.
East India Company also involved due to the competition and political rivalry with the other European nations. European nations were almost equal in technological development and they had captured the wealth-producing regions of the world. For this reason, when East India Company went to Indonesia, they were expelled by the Dutch. Even in India, the Emperor Jahangir did not permit them to trade but they were lucky that they were granted permission by the Prince Shah Jahan. There was a rivalry between the Europeans and they wanted to supersede each other. Besides that, the British had a strong government of Queen Victoria. They were rich, organized and advanced in technology but in India, they had competition with Portuguese, Dutch and later with the French. However they could not imagine in 1608 that they would become the rulers of India in hundred years.

 

[Irfan Atique]

Thankyouuu!
and these are the three points right?
- Due to Russian expansion the British government thought it was too risky to leave India in the hands of a Private company.
-War of Independence (1857)
-EIC was taking too much profit for themselves and by taking a direct control they wouldn't lose the valuable asset.

yes

 

[asadalam]

yes

Sir the Paper was V easy!

 

[Irfan Atique]

Sir the Paper was V easy!

i told every one dear about sce 1 and 2 that 3 to 4 question are in the paper so no need for section 3...... but they just didn't listened to me

 

[Irfan Atique]

i told every one dear about sce 1 and 2 that 3 to 4 question are in the paper so no need for section 3...... but they just didn't listened to me

now m not gonna give any advice.... coz they follow their teachers n m not a teacher in Pakistan..

 

[asadalam]

i told every one dear about sce 1 and 2 that 3 to 4 question are in the paper so no need for section 3...... but they just didn't listened to me

Yup sec 3 is a waste of time!

 

[Umna.Asim]

Hey! I know that you guys are done with your history paper but I wanted to ask some questions.
Can you tell the answers for these?
"Why did the Jihad Movement fail it's aims?" [7]
"Why did Gandhi call Cripps Mission as a post dates cheque on a failing bank?" [7]
"Why did the British take tough measures against the Muslim community after the War of independance?" [7]
please answer these.