- Messages
- 1,171
- Reaction score
- 4,151
- Points
- 273
Physics is easy as shit though chem is really tough !!tbh I'm a bit nervous about chems and phy's paper 1 and 3
We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
Physics is easy as shit though chem is really tough !!tbh I'm a bit nervous about chems and phy's paper 1 and 3
I wrote that NaOH wasn't measured accurately using measuring cylinder , so use pipette or burette to reduce the errorGuys what was your answer for the titration error thingy and improvement ??
I don't know but I had wrote that the error was perhaps the spillage of acid while pouring it into the burette .
And the improvement of this is to be more careful when pouring it up...
Lol..
HereI wrote that NaOH wasn't measured accurately using measuring cylinder , so use pipette or burette to reduce the error
What did you write in the last question ??Same
Here
Oh that was easyWhat did you write in the last question ??
NO NOT MANGANESE OXIDE IT WAS COPPER II OXIDE LOLOh that was easy
In firsr part i wrote (in brief) that note the volume and time taken for h2o2 to decompose then again repeat the experiment with manganese oxide and note the time and volume. . It would be noticed that rate is faster and more vol. Of o2 produced
And in second part i wrote about mass of manganese oxide before and after reac.
And btw even if rate is faster it doesn't produce larger volume of O2Oh that was easy
In firsr part i wrote (in brief) that note the volume and time taken for h2o2 to decompose then again repeat the experiment with manganese oxide and note the time and volume. . It would be noticed that rate is faster and more vol. Of o2 produced
And in second part i wrote about mass of manganese oxide before and after reac.
Yeah what ever was the catalyst and regarding volume i m not sureAnd btw even if rate is faster it doesn't produce larger volume of O2
No there is no effect of it on litmus paper u guys can google it -_-I had never expected that they will ask a litmus test for bromine !!
Me tooI wrote that NaOH wasn't measured accurately using measuring cylinder , so use pipette or burette to reduce the error
Mine was 38What was the answer of difference in temp!
And btw even if rate is faster it doesn't produce larger volume of O2
Yeah what ever was the catalyst and regarding volume i m not sure
yeah i Wrote wrong about volume. . Hope they won't cut more than 1 mark" A catalyst is nor REACTED nor CHANGED in a chemical reaction "
It just lowers the activation hill that's all what it does. Making the reaction happen at a faster rate.
It does not contribute within the chemical reaction regardless of whatever it was..
yeah i Wrote wrong about volume. . Hope they won't cut more than 1 mark
Btw what was the answer of the very first question. The one with the condenser and stuff, there was a label pointing on a kind of flask asking for it's name.
I mean I wrote a boiling flask... is this wrong or wut ?
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now