How was Physics P42

R

rose1700

Messages
150
Reaction score
21
Points
28
The electrons didn't emit in the quantum question last part?

And what happened when sampling frequency increases and longer notes instead of short notes?

what were the two faces at which force was experienced ?
and the part below last part of the magnetism part?

And how where we supposed to link the internal energy of ideal gases with reference to assumption of gases?
 
W

W-inx

Messages
76
Reaction score
34
Points
18
The electrons didn't emit in the quantum question last part? - Nop cuz photon energy < Work function

And what happened when sampling frequency increases and longer notes instead of short notes? Didnt put anythin

what were the two faces at which force was experienced ? Forgot wat i put
and the part below last part of the magnetism part?

And how where we supposed to link the internal energy of ideal gases with reference to assumption of gases? There exists no intermolecular forces of att. b/w molecules of an ideal gas. Ideal gases have no P.E. Thus it can be defined as mean translation K.E of all the molecules of an ideal gas.[/quote]
 
Taci12

Taci12

Messages
142
Reaction score
131
Points
43
W-inx said:
The electrons didn't emit in the quantum question last part? - Nop cuz photon energy < Work function

And what happened when sampling frequency increases and longer notes instead of short notes? Didnt put anythin

what were the two faces at which force was experienced ? Forgot wat i put
and the part below last part of the magnetism part?

And how where we supposed to link the internal energy of ideal gases with reference to assumption of gases? There exists no intermolecular forces of att. b/w molecules of an ideal gas. Ideal gases have no P.E. Thus it can be defined as mean translation K.E of all the molecules of an ideal gas.
Click to expand...
[/quote]

Increasing sampling frequency decreases the step-depth. Thus accuracy of reproduced signal is improved.
Using a larger number of bits decreases step-height. Again, accuracy improves.
 
W

W-inx

Messages
76
Reaction score
34
Points
18

Increasing sampling frequency decreases the step-depth. Thus accuracy of reproduced signal is improved.
Using a larger number of bits decreases step-height. Again, accuracy improves.[/quote]
Zelev heetun sa :O
 
Taci12

Taci12

Messages
142
Reaction score
131
Points
43
W-inx said:
Increasing sampling frequency decreases the step-depth. Thus accuracy of reproduced signal is improved.
Using a larger number of bits decreases step-height. Again, accuracy improves.
Click to expand...
Zelev heetun sa :O[/quote]
:D
 
Pals_1010

Pals_1010

Messages
222
Reaction score
25
Points
38
W-inx said:
Derive using gravational force = Cent. Force then x1/2

I did get change in kinetic energy as far I could remember was 1.0 x 10^8 J But then after retrying i got another value.
Click to expand...

Hey do you remember your value of kinetic energy?
 
Mukit-ul Islam

Mukit-ul Islam

Messages
42
Reaction score
13
Points
18
i have a concern. Please help me out. If for example, your gradient is 127 118 and your absolute error is 30 946.......than how should i write my final answer with the error?????
 
Taci12

Taci12

Messages
142
Reaction score
131
Points
43
Mukit-ul Islam said:
i have a concern. Please help me out. If for example, your gradient is 127 118 and your absolute error is 30 946.......than how should i write my final answer with the error?????
Click to expand...
I don't think errors can be taken to more than 3 s.f. So it would be 127000 +/- 31000.
Personally i would prefer to write it as (12.7 +/- 3.1) x (10^4)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top