• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Mathematics: Post your doubts here!

Messages
23
Reaction score
6
Points
13
from part i) u would have got
y = 70 e^(e^(-3t) -1)

p = mass at time t / initial mass x 100
p = 70 e^(e^(-3t) -1) / 70 x 100
p = e^(e^(-3t)-1)) x 100


now if yu see if t becomes very large the expression e^(-3t) would approach zero .
look at it this way
e^(-3t) = 1/e^(3t)
see if denominator becomes very large the fraction becomes too small i.e. it approaches zero.
thus if e^(-3t) aproaches zero then e^(-3t)-1 approaches -1
thus e^(e^(-3t)-1) approaches e^(-1)

so p = e^(-1) x 100

take yur time reading this post..
Plz Can U Help Me With q6 (i) Part And Q 9 First How To Solve Them Realy Confused Of This Paper..
 
Messages
958
Reaction score
3,499
Points
253
Aoa wr wb

Can someone please tell me, how do we know whether we have to use
5 rather than 4.5 etc for these sort of qns?

Screen shot 2013-05-17 at 9.14.23 PM.png

Thank you.
 
Messages
112
Reaction score
34
Points
38
I'm not able to solve a single question of vectors and argand diagram..I'm screwed.i'm so messed up. I'm crying. :cry: Don't know what to do. Plz help me. :cry:
 
Messages
1,321
Reaction score
490
Points
93
Plz Can U Help Me With q6 (i) Part And Q 9 First How To Solve Them Realy Confused Of This Paper..

bro i did Q6(i) but its too long and too complicated for me to type in the post ...

i shall give u little starting point

tan(2x+x) = (tan2x + tanx)/ (1 - tan(2x)tan(x)) = k tanx


i then substituted tan2x = (2tanx)/ (1-tan^2(x))

and after doing some algebraic i got the answer
 
Messages
1,321
Reaction score
490
Points
93
Plz Can U Help Me With q6 (i) Part And Q 9 First How To Solve Them Realy Confused Of This Paper..
in Question
9i) just equate both the equations

equation of l : r1 = (3-λ)i + (-2+2λ)j + (1+λ)k
equation of m : r2 = (4 +µa)i + (4 +µb)j + (2-µ)k

since they intersect r1 = r2
(3-λ)i + (-2+2λ)j + (1+λ)k = (4 +µa)i + (4 +µb)j + (2-µ)k
compare the coeficients
and after some substitutions u shall get the desired result .

ii) since they are perpendicular ... dot the direction vector of both the lines and equate it to zero ..
u shall get another eqution with a and b . Solve them simultaneously to get values of a and b.

iii) easiest.. when you got values of a and b ... u would have got some equations in terms of a and b for λ and µ in part (i)
calculate either λ or µ and then substitute that value in either equation of l or m respectively ...

its difficult to understand by reading .. just do it to get it :)
 
Messages
681
Reaction score
438
Points
73
I'm not able to solve a single question of vectors and argand diagram..I'm screwed.i'm so messed up. I'm crying. :cry: Don't know what to do. Plz help me. :cry:

These might help, but do as many past paper questions on these topics as you can.
And most importantly pray to Allah, insha'Allah you will get it. :)
 

Attachments

  • A Level Maths P3 Vectors.pdf
    2.3 MB · Views: 13
  • COMPLEX_NUMBERS.pdf
    128.7 KB · Views: 14
  • revision vectors (3).doc
    239.5 KB · Views: 9
Messages
23
Reaction score
6
Points
13
bro i did Q6(i) but its too long and too complicated for me to type in the post ...

i shall give u little starting point

tan(2x+x) = (tan2x + tanx)/ (1 - tan(2x)tan(x)) = k tanx


i then substituted tan2x = (2tanx)/ (1-tan^2(x))

and after doing some algebraic i got the answer
Oh I Also Did The Same But Might Have Done Smthng Wrong In Algebra Thanku Very Much :D
 
Messages
23
Reaction score
6
Points
13
in Question
9i) just equate both the equations

equation of l : r1 = (3-λ)i + (-2+2λ)j + (1+λ)k
equation of m : r2 = (4 +µa)i + (4 +µb)j + (2-µ)k

since they intersect r1 = r2
(3-λ)i + (-2+2λ)j + (1+λ)k = (4 +µa)i + (4 +µb)j + (2-µ)k
compare the coeficients
and after some substitutions u shall get the desired result .

ii) since they are perpendicular ... dot the direction vector of both the lines and equate it to zero ..
u shall get another eqution with a and b . Solve them simultaneously to get values of a and b.

iii) easiest.. when you got values of a and b ... u would have got some equations in terms of a and b for λ and µ in part (i)
calculate either λ or µ and then substitute that value in either equation of l or m respectively ...

its difficult to understand by reading .. just do it to get it :)
 
Messages
681
Reaction score
438
Points
73
from part i) u would have got
y = 70 e^(e^(-3t) -1)

p = mass at time t / initial mass x 100
p = 70 e^(e^(-3t) -1) / 70 x 100
p = e^(e^(-3t)-1)) x 100


now if yu see if t becomes very large the expression e^(-3t) would approach zero .
look at it this way
e^(-3t) = 1/e^(3t)
see if denominator becomes very large the fraction becomes too small i.e. it approaches zero.
thus if e^(-3t) aproaches zero then e^(-3t)-1 approaches -1
thus e^(e^(-3t)-1) approaches e^(-1)

so p = e^(-1) x 100

take yur time reading this post..

Yep understood perfectly ! Thank you soo much ! :D
 
Messages
23
Reaction score
6
Points
13
in Question
9i) just equate both the equations

equation of l : r1 = (3-λ)i + (-2+2λ)j + (1+λ)k
equation of m : r2 = (4 +µa)i + (4 +µb)j + (2-µ)k

since they intersect r1 = r2
(3-λ)i + (-2+2λ)j + (1+λ)k = (4 +µa)i + (4 +µb)j + (2-µ)k
compare the coeficients
and after some substitutions u shall get the desired result .

ii) since they are perpendicular ... dot the direction vector of both the lines and equate it to zero ..
u shall get another eqution with a and b . Solve them simultaneously to get values of a and b.

iii) easiest.. when you got values of a and b ... u would have got some equations in terms of a and b for λ and µ in part (i)
calculate either λ or µ and then substitute that value in either equation of l or m respectively ...

its difficult to understand by reading .. just do it to get it :)
CAn Not dothefirst Part Have Done Therest I Know Its Silly But Can U Plz Show Da Wrking For Part 1 Iam Trying For So Long THANX
 
Messages
1,321
Reaction score
490
Points
93
Messages
23
Reaction score
6
Points
13
Messages
1,321
Reaction score
490
Points
93
CAn Not dothefirst Part Have Done Therest I Know Its Silly But Can U Plz Show Da Wrking For Part 1 Iam Trying For So Long THANX


(3-λ)i + (-2+2λ)j + (1+λ)k = (4 +µa)i + (4 +µb)j + (2-µ)k

comparing coefficients of k
(1+λ) = (2-µ)

λ = 1 - µ

comparing coefficients of i

(3-λ) = (4 +µa)
3 -1 + µ = 4 + µa
µ = 2/(1-a)

comparing coefficients of j

(-2+2λ) = (4 +µb)
-2 + 2 - 2µ = 4 + µb
0 = 4 + µ(2+b)
0 = 4 + (4+2b)/(1-a)

2a-b = 4
 
Top