oh yea sorry 5weren't they supposed to be greater than 5 , not 20?
We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
oh yea sorry 5weren't they supposed to be greater than 5 , not 20?
weren't they supposed to be greater than 5 , not 20?
get 50 then ul get a distinction try your bestIm hoping too. I hope 75,75,50 in p1,p3 and p4. im worried about p6 now
yeah I know thatThats for checking whether you can possibly transform a binomial distribution to a normal distribution.
If A ~ B (n,p) then A ~ N (np, npq); where np > 5 and npq > 5
its np and nq >5 not npqThat's for checking whether you can possibly transform a binomial distribution to a normal distribution.
If A ~ B (n,p) then A ~ N (np, npq); where np > 5 and npq > 5
Pray for me mate. p6 is scaring me more than p3get 50 then ul get a distinction try your best
please anser my questionnnni dint get u ..........i was asking sth different Khan_971
its np and nq >5 not npq
u get thee total arrangement with no restrictions, then if for example u need to separate 2 persons , then u get the number of arrangements when they r together and subtract it from the total.how do you arrange the ppl who must be seperated from each other without using the method of all possible ways minus the ways that they sit together?
is there any other method?? help!!! i'm very weak in permutation and combination!!!
for example there are 7 people and two must be seperated. so its like *p*p*p*p*p* where p refers to the 5 people who are and * are the possible places for those who dont want to sit together. therefore 5! *6P2how do you arrange the ppl who must be seperated from each other without using the method of all possible ways minus the ways that they sit together?
is there any other method?? help!!! i'm very weak in permutation and combination!!!
but please check june 11 63 question 5)iii) they said normal distribution but in the ms they said with or without cc, can u see this and make it clearer to me??CC is only in normal approximation :/
i dont knowbut please check june 11 63 question 5)iii) they said normal distribution but in the ms they said with or without cc, can u see this and make it clearer to me??
ok i hope it won't come confusing problem in our exam tomorrow :/i dont know
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now