- Messages
- 1,243
- Reaction score
- 1,891
- Points
- 173
wht abt 3 sig fig 406000000 right
We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
Yes i knew we had to multiply by 3.6 and first i wrote right,but then i though 108 would be too fast and insensible so i halved it i dont know why :/ paper was ending and i just did it ...How is that even possible ?
3v = 30.
km/h = x3.6
30x3.6 = 108.
Did you use 1.8?
As long as it does not obscure the menaing of th epolygon within the specified range,it does not matter,i guessguys i joined the polygons to axis...... is there any problem?
e.g i started boys from origin and extended ends of both to end corner
Yup.in that exhange and money q answers werewht abt 3 sig fig 406000000 right
U think of someAny other questions?
I know,but i guess one mark is ok.........itna bura na feel karao mujheThat's awful. -.-
CorrectYup.in that exhange and money q answers were
40%,56.25 i think,225 dollars and 400 pounds right
n was 24 and interior angle was 165U think of some
Wht abt interior angle a and octagon and number of sides
Just check the sequence of numbers in old papers and u,ll get how "easy" they r;sadly,none of them come these yearsI expected a number sequence but it didnt come either,maybe these easy q of loci and sequence will come in p2
0.8 and 13/16What was the decimal and fraction you wrote in that inequality
I wrote 0.77 and 4/5 since they had to be between 0.75 and 0.875 M.Omar
I wrote 81/1000.8 and 13/16
upper i dont remember do you?i think lower of perimeter was total of 118 i think.Length was 9 and total area of the shape was 279.Just check the sequence of numbers in old papers and u,ll get how "easy" they r;sadly,none of them come these years
Wht abt lower bound question and upper bound length and length of AG and area of the fig
zat question was really easy though but the transformation question just really went over my head can anyone give some potential links where i can learn it in 1 night or so?upper i dont remember do you?i think lower of perimeter was total of 118 i think.Length was 9 and total area of the shape was 279.
35.5upper i dont remember do you?i think lower of perimeter was total of 118 i think.Length was 9 and total area of the shape was 279.
ditto
Is the perimeter correct?Did you also get 118?35.5
No just post that.Either I got the last two wrong or I don't remember my answer.
And in the second one we had to post that? Not minus it?
wht do u mean by post we had to tell reduction value?Either I got the last two wrong or I don't remember my answer.
And in the second one we had to post that? Not minus it?
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now