• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

physics paper 3, harder than hard

Messages
44
Reaction score
7
Points
8
Electrons flow from the Earth towards the metal sphere, not the other way around. =)
 
Messages
1,767
Reaction score
22,887
Points
523
THE PAPER WAS VERY FUNNY SO I SLEPT. :eek::sleep:
THE TEACHERS WERE ANGRY. IM PRETTY SURE THAT TEACHERS EVEN DIDNT KNOW THE ANSWERS.
THEN JOHN CENA CAME WITH A MIKE TO ME AND SAID THAT DO YOU SMELL WHAT THE ROCK IS COOKING. I ANSWERED THAT I AM DOING EXAM AND TO COME BACK LATER. WHEN I WOKE UP 3 TEACHERS WERE STARING ON ME AND THE INVIGILATOR SAID THAT 1 MINUTE IS LEFT. SO I THOUGHT WHAT THE HELL WILL I DO IN 1 MINUTE, SO I SLEPT AGAIN. THIS TIME I HAD DREAM OF OSAMA BINLADEN TELLING ME HE HIS KHAN AND HE IS NOT A TERRORRIST.:cautious:ANYWAY INSHALLAH EVERYONE WILL GET "A" STAR (INSHALLAH). JUST STUDY WELL FOR PAPER6, I AM ABOUT TO SLEEP NOW BECAUSE 3 DAYS ARE LEFT.
o_O u didnt do da ppr?? :confused:
 
Messages
24
Reaction score
8
Points
13
o my god i cant believe how hard that paper was. The paper was so twisted and hard that i actually ran out of time. I wasn't the only one.

I left a few questions to answer later on and when i finished my last question i ran out of time and never got time to attempt those questions. i left about 20 marks unattended.

Solving past papers didn't help at all. who else has finished this paper? how did you think the paper went, for me it went terrible.
For me it was alright .......But some questions were really confusing like finding the mass of the ice used. Bit time was not at all a problem with me. I finished 15 mins before the exam.
 
Messages
1,767
Reaction score
22,887
Points
523
For me it was alright .......but some questions were really confusing like finding the mass of the ice used. Bit time was not at all a problem with me. i finished 11 mins before the exam.
i finished 25 minutes b4 da xam was supposed 2 b over
 
Messages
185
Reaction score
104
Points
53
efficiency is somewhere around 33 % not 25%

and the bird moves anti-clockwise, because after the additional force applied (when pulled) is not applied anymore when you let it go, the clockwise moment decreases and becomes equal to anti clockwise moment, an the bird rotates anticlockwise to return to equilibirum position.
 
Messages
28
Reaction score
5
Points
3
you had to deduct background radiation like Chucky said.
the efficiency was something like 33%
the bulbs were 8 as a 5% increase in resistance per bulb will give you an 8.4 Ohm resistance.
If you divide 240V by 0.9 A , the total resistance is 266.67 which you then divide by 8.4 to give you the number of bulbs which are functioning at this current.
This comes to be 31.7, which rounds about to 32 bulbs. Thus 8 bulbs fail before a 0.9 A current is present in the circuit.

The bird one, I thought the centre of mass was above the pivot so I said it will go further clockwise thus as the centre of mass will cause a clockwise moment,
But when I realized ( after the paper) that the centre of mass was actually at the pivot itself, I understood that it will turn anti-clockwise to retain equilibrium.

But I still dont know how, can anyone please tell me the logic of it.
 
Messages
28
Reaction score
5
Points
3
The sphere will become negatively charged as the electrons from the earth will neutralise the positive charge but the electrons on the other side will remain attracted to the other sphere and will spread throughout the bigger sphere once the other sphere and the earthing is taken away
 
Messages
16
Reaction score
2
Points
13
can anyone enlighten me if the negative charges on the sphere (the second one, with the wire connected to it) are DISTRIBUTED evenly or STAY CLOSED to the charged rod ?
 
Messages
31
Reaction score
8
Points
18
The power dissipated question wasn't in variant 2 and I got the bulb answer as 2...I used basic algebra..most of my class got it as 2
 
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Points
11
Not sure if this was brought up, but whatever.
In variant 1, there was a question about a bulb containing water at room temperature with a glass tube as the only opening upwards.
It was placed into warm water. The level of water in the glass tube decreased slightly then increased.

(a)Suggest why:
(i)the water level first fell
(ii)the water level then rose
(iii)the rise was greater than the fall

Any ideas about the answer? I'd really appreciate some help. The second one is pretty easy, but I'm not so sure about the first and third :confused:
 
Messages
1,767
Reaction score
22,887
Points
523
Not sure if this was brought up, but whatever.
In variant 1, there was a question about a bulb containing water at room temperature with a glass tube as the only opening upwards.
It was placed into warm water. The level of water in the glass tube decreased slightly then increased.

(a)Suggest why:
(i)the water level first fell
(ii)the water level then rose
(iii)the rise was greater than the fall

Any ideas about the answer? I'd really appreciate some help. The second one is pretty easy, but I'm not so sure about the first and third :confused:
it was a glass flask
i)the flask expanded, and so the liquid fell
iii)liquids expand slightly more than solids do
 
Messages
23
Reaction score
10
Points
13
I thought the efficiency was somewhere around 25% since it's useful energy/total energy yes?
 
Top