• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Physics: Post your doubts here!

Messages
34
Reaction score
19
Points
18
There was this question which asked:
Making reference to the laws of electromagnetic induction, suggest why:
1) an emf is induced in the wire,
2) the emf is alternating.
For the first part obviously we'll use the faraday's law to answer.
But can any one answer the second part WITH REFRENCE TO A LAW?
I mean obviously when a wire is moving up and down, its direction changes and thus (by right hand rule) we know that the direction of induce current will change as well. but how to answer in terms of a law? please help.
 
Messages
75
Reaction score
151
Points
43
Not sure about this one. Here's what the examiner report says:
The answer to this question cannot reliably be obtained by guesswork. Eliminating the pressure at P gives
(h1–h2)ρg = 8000 Pa, so (h1–h2) = 0.060 m. D is the only answer that fits.

Yes D is the answer.... Thankyou very much for your help :)
 
Messages
537
Reaction score
358
Points
73
The calculation shows that it takes 2 ms for one wave to complete its cycle. Now each square on the horizontal axis respresents 0.5ms. Thus dividing 2/0.5, it must take 4 complete squares for the wave to complete on cycle. That happens only in B
thnk u so much
 
Messages
8,477
Reaction score
34,837
Points
698
Messages
72
Reaction score
72
Points
28
For the same current, there is higher V across C than in the resistor. At 5v or above, even though the current in the resistor will be more than in C, the Voltage across C would be 5v out of the total of 7, thus again making the power dissipated across it higher.

View attachment 39428
This is what i don't get, after 5V for the same current resistor R has greater voltage than component C
 
Messages
1,258
Reaction score
1,397
Points
173
This is what i don't get, after 5V for the same current resistor R has greater voltage than component C
You have got to see the current now, not voltage. The voltage across the two components would be different as they are in series now. in series the current is the same. Therefore, you will have to see the voltages for the same amount of curent
 
Messages
1,258
Reaction score
1,397
Points
173
Messages
119
Reaction score
181
Points
53
Total constant of the three forces would be:
For the two above, it would be 2k. Now, add the third one,
1/2k + 1/3k = 5/6k = 6/5k (Just add them together like you do in parallel circuits when they are connected end to end)

W = 6/5k * x
x = W *5/6k = A

thanks a lot! :D
 
Top