• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Physics: Post your doubts here!

Messages
1,983
Reaction score
3,044
Points
273
We use P=VI to determine the efficiency? and how do we use it? Can give some examples? Thanks a lot!! :D
in this question we first found total power, then wasted power and then efficiency.
upload_2014-5-9_7-28-45-png.41690
 
Messages
10
Reaction score
23
Points
13
Aoa,
Guys if anyone of u have COMPLETE PHYSICS DEFINATIONS FOR AS Level ... Please share!
As well as the best and detailed explanation for projectile motion ... Would be well appreciated :)
URGENT HELP PLEASE!
Thank you :)
hope this helps mate i found a while back :D
 

Attachments

  • AS Equations and Definitions.pdf
    310.9 KB · Views: 24
  • AS Level Physics Basic Electricity Summary copy.pdf
    383.8 KB · Views: 23
  • Corrected Projectile Motion.pdf
    1.3 MB · Views: 20
Messages
21
Reaction score
32
Points
13
Can someone please help me with this one?


I know how these questions go but this one seems abit tricky.

2mhbres.png


They said
A graph is plotted of V/E on the y-axis against 1/R on the x-axis. Express the gradient in terms of F.

Now if the gradient is y/x I get
Gradient = VR/E

Now in terms of F
From the equation, F = VR/E - R
So gradient is F+R

Now R = FE/(V-E)
So if we replace that too in our F+R gradient equation we dont end up with F.

Thats the answer in the ms, F. Gradient = F.

Can someone please solve this and if went right, explain it to me kindly?

Highly appreciate it.
 
Messages
122
Reaction score
93
Points
38
http://papers.xtremepapers.com/CIE/Cambridge International A and AS Level/Physics (9702)/9702_w07_qp_4.pdf

hi i have a doubt in this paper, ques # 1 (b)(ii)
this is the answer the ms provides :

"force in cord = weight + centripetal force (can be an equation) ..........................C1
force in cord = (L – 13) × 5/1.8 or force constant = 5.0/1.8 ................................C1
(L – 13) × 5/1.8 = 5.0 + 5/9.8 × L × 10^-2 × 8.7^2
..................................................C1
L = 17.2 cm ...........................................................................................................A1 [4]
(constant centripetal force of 5.0 N gives L = 16.6 cm allow 2/4)
"

can someone please clarify whether f=mv^2 /r [centripetal force right?] is being used and why is the 'r' is being multiplied instead of divided? (radius r is Lx10^-2)
 
Last edited:
Messages
39
Reaction score
41
Points
18
Can someone please help me with this one?


I know how these questions go but this one seems abit tricky.

2mhbres.png


They said
A graph is plotted of V/E on the y-axis against 1/R on the x-axis. Express the gradient in terms of F.

Now if the gradient is y/x I get
Gradient = VR/E

Now in terms of F
From the equation, F = VR/E - R
So gradient is F+R

Now R = FE/(V-E)
So if we replace that too in our F+R gradient equation we dont end up with F.

Thats the answer in the ms, F. Gradient = F.

Can someone please solve this and if went right, explain it to me kindly?

Highly appreciate it.


V=FE/R + E
V=E{F/R + 1}
V/E=F/R + 1 where V/E is y and 1/R is x in the form y=mx+c

hope u get it :)
 
Messages
10
Reaction score
23
Points
13
Thank you soooo MUCH!! :D :D
Just wanted to ask .... If u've any other useful notes as well..cuz these seem quite useful :D thank u
Please share.. If u do :)
You are most welcome. Here these are all i have :)
 

Attachments

  • AS A Level General Wave Properties.pdf
    1.3 MB · Views: 16
  • Elastic Deformation1.pdf
    1 MB · Views: 10
  • Factors effecting the diffraction pattern.pdf
    66 KB · Views: 16
  • Glossary.pdf
    996.2 KB · Views: 8
  • Latest Estimates.pdf
    47.7 KB · Views: 15
  • Practical Question Checklist.pdf
    983.8 KB · Views: 14
  • Practicals Recap Type I-1.pdf
    91.5 KB · Views: 12
  • Practicals Recap Type II.pdf
    83.2 KB · Views: 10
  • Rutherford Scattering.ppt
    261 KB · Views: 8
  • The Alpha Scattering Experiment.pdf
    327.6 KB · Views: 9
Messages
144
Reaction score
107
Points
53
Guys, is this experiment to determine acceleration of free fall alright?

1) Place a metallic ball attached to an electromagnet in a closed vacuum glass box, with current switched on.
2) Measure the distance from the bottom of the ball to the surface where ball will drop.
3) Switch off the current. Use a digital stopwatch to calculate time the ball takes to travel to surface
4) Use the equation of motion s = 1/2 a t^2 + ut (u=o) => a = 2*distance/(time^2)

To get more accurate result, use longer distance so as to reduce percentage uncertainty both in time and the distance
 
Messages
872
Reaction score
894
Points
103
Can someone please help me with this one?


I know how these questions go but this one seems abit tricky.

2mhbres.png


They said
A graph is plotted of V/E on the y-axis against 1/R on the x-axis. Express the gradient in terms of F.

Now if the gradient is y/x I get
Gradient = VR/E

Now in terms of F
From the equation, F = VR/E - R
So gradient is F+R

Now R = FE/(V-E)
So if we replace that too in our F+R gradient equation we dont end up with F.

Thats the answer in the ms, F. Gradient = F.

Can someone please solve this and if went right, explain it to me kindly?

Highly appreciate it.
You got the equation in terms of F wrong. F=R(V-E)/E. and shouldn't the gradient be V= E(F/R + 1)--> V/E= F/R + 1 where 1 s the y intercept and F is the graduebt
 
Messages
872
Reaction score
894
Points
103
Guys, is this experiment to determine acceleration of free fall alright?

1) Place a metallic ball attached to an electromagnet in a closed vacuum glass box, with current switched on.
2) Measure the distance from the bottom of the ball to the surface where ball will drop.
3) Switch off the current. Use a digital stopwatch to calculate time the ball takes to travel to surface
4) Use the equation of motion s = 1/2 a t^2 + ut (u=o) => a = 2*distance/(time^2)

To get more accurate result, use longer distance so as to reduce percentage uncertainty both in time and the distance
When will we need to describe this?
 
Top