• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Physics: Post your doubts here!

Messages
165
Reaction score
490
Points
73
i did this actually ,can u show me steps please..?
GMm [1/(R+h1) - 1/(R+h2)] = 1/2m (v1^2 - v2^2)
m cancels.
GM [1/(R+h1) - 1/(R+h2)] = 1/2 (v1^2 - v2^2)
Make M subject:
M = (v1^2 - v2^2)/2G[1/(R+h1) - 1/(R+h2)]
M = (5370^2 - 5090^2)/2*6.67*10^11 [1/(6.38+19.9)*10^6 - 1/(6.38+22.7)*10^6]
M = 2928800/13.34*10^-11 [3.66385*10^-9]
M = 2928800/4.88758*10^-19
M = 5.99*10^24 = 6*10^24
 
Messages
94
Reaction score
66
Points
28
but
GMm [1/(R+h1) - 1/(R+h2)] = 1/2m (v1^2 - v2^2)
m cancels.
GM [1/(R+h1) - 1/(R+h2)] = 1/2 (v1^2 - v2^2)
Make M subject:
M = (v1^2 - v2^2)/2G[1/(R+h1) - 1/(R+h2)]
M = (5370^2 - 5090^2)/2*6.67*10^11 [1/(6.38+19.9)*10^6 - 1/(6.38+22.7)*10^6]
M = 2928800/13.34*10^-11 [3.66385*10^-9]
M = 2928800/4.88758*10^-19
M = 5.99*10^24 = 6*10^24


But why are we subtracting like 1/R,why not just directly R+h1 - R+h2?

sorry for trouble!
 
Messages
165
Reaction score
490
Points
73
but



But why are we subtracting like 1/R,why not just directly R+h1 - R+h2?

sorry for trouble!
The formula for P.E. = -GMm/r
r is the distance and it is in the denominator. In this case, r1 is R+h1 and r2 is R+h2.
Change in PE = final PE - Initial PE
= -GMm/r2 - (-GMm/r1)
= GMm/r1 - GMm/r2
Take GMm common:
GMm(1/r1 - 1/r2)

Oh and you cannot simply multiply the distances r1 and r2 on the right side during calculation without taking LCM as there is a - sign between them.
 
Messages
94
Reaction score
66
Points
28
The formula for P.E. = -GMm/r
r is the distance and it is in the denominator. In this case, r1 is R+h1 and r2 is R+h2.
Change in PE = final PE - Initial PE
= -GMm/r2 - (-GMm/r1)
= GMm/r1 - GMm/r2
Take GMm common:
GMm(1/r1 - 1/r2)

Oh and you cannot simply multiply the distances r1 and r2 on the right side during calculation without taking LCM as there is a - sign between them.
Thank you sooo much !!
 
Messages
165
Reaction score
490
Points
73
plz solve this !
Intensity is directly proportional to Amplitude squared
Intensity is inversely proportional to distance squared.
Therefore:
A^2 = k/x^2
When x=r, A=8.
64 = k/r^2
k = 64r^2

When x = 2r, A=?
A^2 = 64r^2/(2r)^2
A^2 = 64/4
A = 4 um
 
Messages
1,160
Reaction score
3,858
Points
273
Why do magnets attract ferromagnetic materials only? Why not other materials as well?

Other materials dont have the proper alignment of north and south pole and the materials whose alignment cant be changed by the magnet are not attracted by the magnet.
 
Messages
1,063
Reaction score
2,837
Points
273
Other materials dont have the proper alignment of north and south pole and the materials whose alignment cant be changed by the magnet are not attracted by the magnet.
What exactly do you mean by "proper alignment" ? And why don't they have proper alignment? And why can a magnet change the alignment of iron but not of for example wood or paper?
 
Messages
1,160
Reaction score
3,858
Points
273
What exactly do you mean by "proper alignment" ? And why don't they have proper alignment? And why can a magnet change the alignment of iron but not of for example wood or paper?
thats what i meant with alignment ....when the magnetic substances are gets their proper alignment having proper direction of north and south pole then they are magnetized and thats the reason why they are attracted to the magnets..
DSC_0437.jpg
 
Messages
2
Reaction score
2
Points
11
Assalamualikum wr wb!
I'm stuck in this question and I was wondering if anyone could help me out a little bit.
Q: Monochromatic radiation of wavelength 546nm falls of a potassium surface of area 7.5cm ^2 in an evacuated chamber. intensity of surfave is 60Wm^2 and it may be assumed that 1% of the photons wmit electrons from the surface. what is the photoelectric current?
What I did is , found the intensity=power/area. power=energy/time. So, I found time this way and applied this time in the formula of , current=charge /time. I multilpied the charge with 19 bcuz that's the atomic no. of potassium.
I'm not getting the right answer which is 0.020 micro Amps. What am I doing wrong? Help?
 
Messages
2
Reaction score
2
Points
11
Assalamualikum wr wb!
I'm stuck in this question and I was wondering if anyone could help me out a little bit.
Q: Monochromatic radiation of wavelength 546nm falls of a potassium surface of area 7.5cm ^2 in an evacuated chamber. intensity of surfave is 60Wm^2 and it may be assumed that 1% of the photons wmit electrons from the surface. what is the photoelectric current?
What I did is , found the intensity=power/area. power=energy/time. So, I found time this way and applied this time in the formula of , current=charge /time. I multilpied the charge with 19 bcuz that's the atomic no. of potassium.
I'm not getting the right answer which is 0.020 micro Amps. What am I doing wrong? Help?
 
Top