• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Physics: Post your doubts here!

Messages
50
Reaction score
24
Points
18
  1. (a)= 2.6*10^-17N
    i need help in part (c) why did they multiply the the charge of point A BY 2? is it becuz they are also considering point B? but then why isn't the distance 12 micrometers instead of 6? since the separation is 12.
    how did they calculate the second line of the markscheme?
They are asking for work done from mid point of AB to point P. Charges are same on both spheres and the distance as well ie 6um from both A and B to midpoint. At a point the total potential experienced by the e is equal to sum of potentials from both A and B charges to that point. Thus at point P the potential is equal to sum of the potential which is now 3um from A and 9um from B. The charges remain same. Now Energy= change in potential × charge on the e (the electric potential energy formula)
 
Messages
75
Reaction score
48
Points
28
can someone please explain how to do this question;
the markscheme did total attnetuation + signal to noise power ratio
but i thought i could do it this way:
what i did:
total attenuation: 84*0.19=16dB
-16=10log(signal output power/signal input power)
-16=10log(signal output power/9.7*10^3)
signal output= 2.5*10^-4 W

signal to noise ratio=10log(signal/noise)
28=10log(2.5*10^-4/noise power)
noise power= 3.9*10^-7W
hence ratio =
input power/noise outpout
9.7*10^-3/3.9*10^-7
=2.5*10^4 dB
however the ms says the answer is 44dB
 

Attachments

  • help 1.PNG
    help 1.PNG
    29.1 KB · Views: 10
Messages
7
Reaction score
3
Points
3
can someone please explain how to do this question;
the markscheme did total attnetuation + signal to noise power ratio
but i thought i could do it this way:
what i did:
total attenuation: 84*0.19=16dB
-16=10log(signal output power/signal input power)
-16=10log(signal output power/9.7*10^3)
signal output= 2.5*10^-4 W

signal to noise ratio=10log(signal/noise)
28=10log(2.5*10^-4/noise power)
noise power= 3.9*10^-7W
hence ratio =
input power/noise outpout
9.7*10^-3/3.9*10^-7
=2.5*10^4 dB
however the ms says the answer is 44dB
actually u r not finding ratio in decibels what u r doing is working out ratio in watts.U got the answer 2.5 *10^4 ,now u put log in 2.5*10^4 and multiply with 10 u will get 44db
 
Messages
21
Reaction score
10
Points
13
Can someone please draw a circuit diagram for this with a protective diode? The op-amp is inverting.
 

Attachments

  • inverting.PNG
    inverting.PNG
    65.5 KB · Views: 10
Messages
15
Reaction score
3
Points
13
Can someone please draw a circuit diagram for this with a protective diode? The op-amp is inverting.
Here.
The first diode is the rectifier diode. This will make sure your relay switches on only when there is a positive cycle of voltage.
Now some Electromagnetism comes into picture. A relay is an electromagnet, if there is a current in the coil it will act as a magnet, but if there is a large change in voltage there will be a change in magnetic flux linkage and an large emf will be induced. To avoid damaging the op amp, the other protective diode is used.
 

Attachments

  • flyack.PNG
    flyack.PNG
    72.9 KB · Views: 16
Messages
21
Reaction score
10
Points
13
Here.
The first diode is the rectifier diode. This will make sure your relay switches on only when there is a positive cycle of voltage.
Now some Electromagnetism comes into picture. A relay is an electromagnet, if there is a current in the coil it will act as a magnet, but if there is a large change in voltage there will be a change in magnetic flux linkage and an large emf will be induced. To avoid damaging the op amp, the other protective diode is used.

thank you so much!
 
Messages
15
Reaction score
3
Points
13
someone please help
This is about your 2nd question first part

(i)
We have a lot of information in the question itself.
We have been given a:
  • Gold Nucleus
  • Alpha Particle!
Lets list the Data for Gold Nucleus:
  • Charge : 79e
  • Convert to coloumbs: 79 * (1.6 * 10^-19)
  • Answer: 1.264 * 10^-17
Lets list Data for Alpha Particle:
  • This is a Helium Nucleus basically
  • Helium has 2 Protons.
  • So it has a charge of +2e
  • Answer: 3.2 * 10^-19
  • We also know the alpha particle's energy which is 7.7 * 10^-13
Okay Lets solve.

Electric potential at a point the in the work done per unit charge (very important)

So Ф = Joules/ Coloumb
So for the alpha particle, its electric potential due to the Gold nucleus is:
  1. Ф = 7.7 * 10^-13/ 3.2 *10^-19
  2. Answer: 2406250 J/C
Now lets use our original Electric potential formula which was derived from the Coloumb's force

Ф = Q/(4piEpsilon) r
Solving for r

r = Q/ (4piEpsilon)Ф
Q will be the charge on the gold nucleus
So r =4.72* 10^-14
So if the distance b/w the alpha particle and gold nucleus is (r) then the radius has to be smaller!!
 
Messages
785
Reaction score
2,290
Points
253
I have ATP tomorrow with almost zero preparation. I'm about to finish the book in a hour or so. I'll look at 4 years of past papers and do some practice.

Suggest something urgently please.

AND btw, can I leave the nuclear/atomic energy chapters? I don't think they come in ATP/P42
 
Messages
15
Reaction score
3
Points
13
I have ATP tomorrow with almost zero preparation. I'm about to finish the book in a hour or so. I'll look at 4 years of past papers and do some practice.

Suggest something urgently please.

AND btw, can I leave the nuclear/atomic energy chapters? I don't think they come in ATP/P42
No bad idea, they are actually present as one whole question. It's fairly simple
I suggest you go through it.
 
Top