• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Physics: Post your doubts here!

Messages
1,824
Reaction score
949
Points
123
can you please help me in how to answer questions such as exam 9709/32/O/N10 the question 8 part b

its basically after making partial fractions...expanding it to ascending powers upto x^3 etc

how do you do these? plz help :(

Wrong thread :p
 
Messages
960
Reaction score
3,500
Points
253

okay look, if you reduce the wavelength of the incident radiation, the energy of the photon increases (since energy of the photon is inversely proportional to the wavelength).
This will mean that each of the photons will now be carrying more energy. So, inorder to maintain a constant intensity, the rate of arrival of the photons on the metal surface must be reduced.
Therefore, the rate of emission of the photoelectrons will be reduced. (Photoelectric current is the rate of emission of photoelectrons).

Hope it helped.
 
Messages
1,394
Reaction score
1,377
Points
173
I remember tht...kinda tough, hold on.

pressure = density * g * height
pressure in the hole = 17.5MPa = 17.5 * 10^6 Pa, which is a result of the pressures of both the liquids p1 n p2
So, P(hole) = P1 + P2
17.5 * 10^6 = (d1 * g * h1) + (d2 * g * h2) ------> d1 = density of water = 1000kgm^-3 h1 = 2000 - x m
d2 = density of oil = 830 kgm^-3 h2 = x m
17.5 * 10^6 = [10000 * 9.81 * (2000-x)] + [830 * 9.81 * x]
17.5 * 10^6 = 9810 x + 19620000 + 8142.3 x
x =1271 m
why is 9810 not -ve? i mean shouldn't it be -9810?? :confused:
 
Messages
382
Reaction score
315
Points
73
I always get confused in interpreting questions regarding a variable resistor or a length of a wire in a circuit.
Could anyone please explain when p.d across a variable resistor or a length of wire in a circuit is maximum/minimum using a jockey (contact) to vary the resistance?
Thanks
 
Messages
41
Reaction score
21
Points
18
A trolley runs from P to Q along a track. At Q its potential energy is 50kJ less than at P.
trolley
P
Q
At P, the kinetic energy of the trolley is 5kJ. Between P and Q, the work the trolley does against
friction is 10kJ.
What is the kinetic energy of the trolley at Q?
A 35kJ B 45kJ C 55kJ D 65kJ
 
Messages
41
Reaction score
21
Points
18
A metal cube of side l is placed in a vice and compressed elastically by two opposing forces F.
F F l
l
metal cube
How will ∆l, the amount of compression, relate to l?
A ∆l ∝ 2
1
l
B ∆l ∝
l
1
C ∆l ∝ l D ∆l ∝ l
2
 
Messages
6,440
Reaction score
31,077
Points
698
salamz plz help wid dis qs...frm m/j-10-43...qs 4(c)
gary221

To calculate the work done, 1st find the change in potential...
For tht, find the potential of the electron at midpoint of line AB
This potential will be influenced by both the point charges at A n B -----> electric potential = kQ/r whr r = distance of separation.
So, potential at midpoint = potential due to charge A + potential due to charge B
= kQ(a)/r + kQ(b)/r
= [(6.4 × 10^–19) / (4πε0 × 6 × 10^–6)] + [(6.4 × 10^–19) / (4πε0 × 6 × 10^–6)]
= 1.92 * 10^-3 V
Note Q = charge at A/B

Potential at P = kQ(a)/ra + kQ(b)/rb
= [(6.4 × 10^–19) / (4πε0 × 3 × 10^–6)] + [(6.4 × 10^–19) / (4πε0 × 9 × 10^–6)]
= 2.56*10^-3 V
Now change in potential = potential at P - potential at midpoint
= (2.56 * 10^-3) - (1.92* 10^-3)
= 6.4 * 10^-4 V

since electric potential = work done in bringing UNIT charge
So, work done in moving an electron = potential * charge of electron
= (6.4 * 10^-4) * (1.6 * 10^-19)
= 1.0(24) * 10^-22 J
Hope u gt it!!
:p
 
Messages
467
Reaction score
101
Points
53
okay look, if you reduce the wavelength of the incident radiation, the energy of the photon increases (since energy of the photon is inversely proportional to the wavelength).
This will mean that each of the photons will now be carrying more energy. So, inorder to maintain a constant intensity, the rate of arrival of the photons on the metal surface must be reduced.
Therefore, the rate of emission of the photoelectrons will be reduced. (Photoelectric current is the rate of emission of photoelectrons).

Hope it helped.
thanks alot for your reply
iam a bit still confused like isnt intersity the no. of photons travelling? so if thet are constant wouldn't the current remain constant?
 
Messages
6,440
Reaction score
31,077
Points
698
A metal cube of side l is placed in a vice and compressed elastically by two opposing forces F.
F F l
l
metal cube
How will ∆l, the amount of compression, relate to l?
A ∆l ∝ 2
1
l
B ∆l ∝
l
1
C ∆l ∝ l D ∆l ∝ l
2

paper link??
 
Messages
6,440
Reaction score
31,077
Points
698

Since both the nuclei have initial kinetic energy = Ek ---> total initial kinetic energy = 2Ek.
Now, as the nuclei(both positively charged) move closer together, they gain electric potential energy.
But, as the distance btw them is being reduced, they lose gravitational potential energy.
ie kinetic energy + gravitational potential energy is lost.
electric potential energy is gained.
So, 2Ek + ΔEgpe = ΔEepe ------> 2EK= ΔEepe – ΔEgpe
So, 2Ek = (6.06 × 10–14 ) - (1.93 × 10–49 )
Ek = 3.03 * 10^-14 J
Converting into MeV,
Ek = (3.03 * 10^-14)/(1.6 * 10^-13)
Ek = 0.19 MeV.
Hope u gt it!
:D
 
Top