HI FREINDS HOW WAS THE PHYSICS ATP GCSE O LAVEL?

[Fate0]

Refractive index was 1.59, refracted angle L was 40.3 and volume was 1.9.

 

[funky brat]

Refractive index was 1.59, refracted angle L was 40.3 and volume was 1.9.

Yay, volume was 1.9 cm^3.

 

[asadalam]

Fate0

Question 1 part b. How to measure Length L correctly.

I said immerse the rule into the water as zero mark co-incides with the water level.
And then align it vertically with rod, and use set-square to find the answer. I also drew all this apparatus on the figure.

EVERYONE HAS A DIFFERENT WAY.

Someone is using a cobalt chloride paper.
Someone is pulling out the rod, and marking the water prints.
Someone is marking the beaker.
Someone is inserting the rule on the side.

Is my answer right?

Well one thing is for sure.You cant measure by inserting a rule,since it said a THIN BEAKER.They mentioned it so i guess it meant something

 

[Lilly2318]

So everyones talking abt Physics, How was Urdu A ppr?

 

[muhammadali233]

Refractive index was 1.59, refracted angle L was 40.3 and volume was 1.9.

i wrote it 1.55 (the refractive index) will that make a difference cause i dont really remember

 

[asadalam]

Guys stop worrying about refractive index.It has a range as with all construction questions so many of your answers will be fine.

 

[Lilly2318]

what abiut Urdu A?

 

[muhammadali233]

Guys stop worrying about refractive index.It has a range as with all construction questions so many of your answers will be fine.

*phew

 

[muhammadali233]

what abiut Urdu A?

anyone even takes that?

 

[Nazuk Qureshi]

No, they said that the REFRACTIVE INDEX can be calculated with the RATIO GIVEN.
We had to input the measurements and get the value for refractive index.

Refractive index is not a RATIO, it's a value.

guys she is correct. the question was crystal clear it asked us to just calculate through the ratio and find the refractive index which can never be a ratio plus they said to give your ANSWER IN TWO DECIMAL PLACE. which was 1.57.

 

[Dark Destination]

Well one thing is for sure.You cant measure by inserting a rule,since it said a THIN BEAKER.They mentioned it so i guess it meant something

But we don't know the dimensions of a thin beaker.

But you have a point :/

 

[Lilly2318]

anyone even takes that?

yes i gave

 

[asadalam]

But we don't know the dimensions of a thin beaker.

But you have a point :/

Its true but every detail out of the norm means something bro,and you know that too.But all we can do is speculate till the ms comes out.Just work hard on P1 and P2 as this carries far less weightage.

 

[muhammadali233]

But we don't know the dimensions of a thin beaker.

But you have a point :/

1000 possibilities 1 answer lets wait for the marking schemes

 

[Dark Destination]

1000 possibilities 1 answer lets wait for the marking schemes

But you said you wrote the same

 

[muhammadali233]

yes i gave

how did it go ,well i gave urdu b back in 2013

 

[muhammadali233]

But you said you wrote the same

I am not the examiner i may be wrong may not be :/

 

[asadalam]

I am not the examiner i may be wrong may not be :/

when will ms come out

 

[Dark Destination]

when will ms come out

So you're saying the beaker won't allow a rule to fit in.. because it's too small..

And you're making that deduction without even knowing the actual diameter of that beaker, which wasn't given. .-.

 

[Lilly2318]

In english can we rite a narrative on one word topic