- Messages
- 191
- Reaction score
- 175
- Points
- 53
yah i diddid u round off the depreciation to 4061 or smething??
We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
yah i diddid u round off the depreciation to 4061 or smething??
t remembered it was 4605.5 rounded to 4606yah i did
I was talking about Q3, not Q2.yeah it said no
'scrap value' but the depreciation charge accumulate was less than the cost, meaning that althought it was sold for nil, it haadd some bbok value which was loss on sale. so there
e dispoed offvehicle, 16000 was already adjusted so it need not be deducted from 65000[(65000-16000)-(37578-7000)]*25% i remember
You got this because you retook the affect of depreciation already included in the trial balance.i don't understand, i got 4060/4061 so here is this difference of 1000!!! can you show how?
I was talking about Q3, not Q2.
We still have Paper 3 left. And moreover, GT is definitely going to be low.i think u'r rite...so byebye A i guess....
Just 65000 - 37578[(65000-16000)-(37578-7000)]*25% i remember
For that last part? $24000wat did u multiply the 8% with?
just because the loass was recorded it doen't show that they also adjusted for the asset cost and depreciation, was it written somewhere that it was adjustedJust 65000 - 37578
Don't retake the affect of depreciation because loss on disposal was already shown in the trial balance.
Really?just because the loass was recorded it doen't show that they also adjusted for the asset cost and depreciation, was it written somewhere that it was adjusted
Exactly! They wanted to confuse candidates and apparently, they were very successful at that.then what was the point of giving that information in the additional information if it was already adjusted?!
the schedule of non current asstes it was neededExactly! They wanted to confuse candidates and apparently, they were very successful at that.
you said it was adjusted now you are saying it was needed for the schedulefor
the schedule of non current asstes it was needed
i took the lower of cost in both the income statement and balance sheetWhich inventory level did you guys take?
I didn't take NRV rather cost because we take lower of cost. According to IAS 2
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now