- Messages
- 11
- Reaction score
- 4
- Points
- 13
We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
can anyone help me with this i dont understand how these diagrams came to be i mean i did study the reactions but these diagrams make no sense to me please help its question no 4
good idea from bottom much easierIts always best to start from the bottom...
can anyone help me with this i dont understand how these diagrams came to be i mean i did study the reactions but these diagrams make no sense to me please help its question no 4
thankyou thankyou you guys are so helpfulView attachment 26144
For these synthesis, it's always best to go backwards. Start from the products and then find the original compound.
I'd just like to add, the reason the final compound is an ester and not amide is because otherwise the arene would have an-NH3Cl and not an -NH2 group as it was an acid hydrolysis.
comming comming soon hold on ppl, ur bro is outrageously preparing to show cie whoz their daddy!!!!umm...xhizors i think we need you here
for the second question u have posted..
its the same scenario. first u will see how many hydrogen protons available on each type of proton from the number given at the top of each peak and then u look at the splitting of the peak..from the splitting u will be able to know what is the adjacent type of proton sticking to the one u r trying to find.
now the first peak at 1.2 approx is a triplet which means the adjacent group attached to it must contain 2 hydrogen protons..so it must be CH3 attached to CH2.
the peak at approx 2 is a singlet and has 3 hydrogen protons so it must be attached to attached to to something which doesnt split it like an OH or C=O but it cant be an OH since wdont have any peak that shows OH is present so it will obviously be C=O..from here i started noticing that our organic compound might be an ester since there is a C=O and doesnt have OH and it says 2 oxygen is present in it.. so it can be CH3COOR
now the final peak has 2 hydrogen protons in it and it is split into quartet so it must be next to a group that has 3 hydrogen atoms..from here u can notice our compound will be CH3CH2CO2CH3..got it ?
JazakAllah for ur help once again this really helped me alot May Allah bless you alwaysthe final question!!
this one u will not need to use the n+1 rule since there is no splitting so u can say "yaay" no confusing shit in the question..anyway lets look at the peaks!
first peak at 3.8 approx. has 3 hydrogen protons present in it looking in the data booklet is can be R-O-CH3
second peak at 5.5 is as we know obviously the OH peak so R-OH
now the final peak is at approx 6.8 looking in the data booklet thats a benzene ring but notice that it contains 4 hydrogen and not 6 as a regular benzene ring so it has lost 2 hydrogens at 1st and 4th position so it is R-C6H4-R.
now combine all what we got together u will have CH3-O-C6H4-OH..i guess all of them is a singlet peak because if u see all the groups we found are attached to oxygen so they wont have any splitting ( i am kinda sure of that)
i will be glad if i made u understand the 3 questions u have posted hehe
thanksss i am glad i helped hehe !JazakAllah for ur help once again this really helped me alot May Allah bless you always
Not always the case, its just a possibility.Hi guys. Can someone please tell me why first electron affinity is exothermic while the second one is endothermic?
i explained it check chem doubts thread
yep saw that..thanku once againi explained it check chem doubts thread
Can you please make your question a bit more clear? What do you mean?plz anyone help me with d orbital degeneration...
do u mean the splitting of the degenerate d orbitals to non-degenerate d orbitals during the formation of complex ions ?plz anyone help me with d orbital degeneration...
Dude I would appreciate it if you can give me a clearer answerNot always the case, its just a possibility.
yeah ...please explain the splitting part and how it is formed.do u mean the splitting of the degenerate d orbitals to non-degenerate d orbitals during the formation of complex ions ?
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now