• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

confirm salts chem34

Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Points
0
oh goddamnit .. how many marks do u think im losing ? grad was abt the same 2.46 and +29kJ
 
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Points
0
but the grad was negative .. - 2.46b :( which means i plotted the inversed graph ... :(
 
Messages
595
Reaction score
39
Points
0
it was of 3 marks.. I think u wud lose 1.... And ur value is fine as well so u lose only one..
I lose more... I did a stupid mistake.. dint read that we had to do 5 times.. lol ! i lose 2 to 3 marks there... The rest is awesome !
 
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Points
0
thats good to hear ! ... now im off . Big day tomorrow ... phy p4 and math p3 .
 
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
Points
0
my gradient was 1.75 and enthalpy about 60kJmol-1 ... damn. and no the gradient isn't supposed to be negative i think.
 

Xam

Messages
112
Reaction score
0
Points
26
i got gradient -2.64
n mole: 0.28
Energy: 60.smthng......
 
Messages
595
Reaction score
39
Points
0
gradient would be positive man !! Fall in temperature was increasing as the masss was increasing !
 
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Points
0
u know wat my teacher said?
most of us for FB10 AND FB11 we wrote turn green..
she said we will b suspected malpractice..coz we didnt
see ut yet we wrote..so worry..sigh...can anyone ask their teacher is tis true?
 
Messages
595
Reaction score
39
Points
0
I dunt get u.. !!! I tested them with with dichromate and they did turn green.. Wt malpractice :/
 
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Points
0
i am nt sure..sigh..coz we didnt get it..yet since is alcohol then we wrote..it wont b malpractice, rite? i am so worry
 
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Well i had good luck in it. My gradiant was 2 and enthalpy was 54.3kj :D
WHT TO DO FOR THE PHYSICS AND BIO> bio i can tell u that which cell will come. teacher promised me he would tell me one day before. but someone help me with physics 34:D Thanks!
 
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Grad cant be negative. he said bfl should pass through origin. So how come grad be negative. i got ethalpy change 790.......no one even near my value..sigh..
 
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
Points
0
my enthalpy is around 60. and gradient is 1.75. I answered alcohol is in FB 9 and FB 12 because when its being oxidized with potassium dichromate it turned to ketone and aldehyde. so they are alcohols. rite? or am I just being dumb?
 
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Guyx the correct gradient is around 2
myn was cmin 2.37
da enthalpy change shud b near 25
lyk 25.6 kJ/mol......
bt i did a silly mistake in ds part

for da salts it was NH4 the common cation
and Fe2+ was the other cation
and SO4 was in FB7

i wrote
FB9 KETONE
FB10 and FB11 ALCOHOL

for da errors it was 0.1/5.6 * 100 for the balance
and 1.0/12 *100 for the temperature

bt i didnt undstand that last part ov Q.1`
i wrote hat the studnts took incorrect measurements of mass or volume!!
ds was jus a blind guex jus to write smthng instead ov nthng---
odawse mja ya part blkl smj nai aya!!!!
ne one who nox the CoRrECT answer plx sHaRE!!
 
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Points
0
I also got the gradient as 2.37! But didn't know, how to find enthalpy change! Got it near 60 something!!!! :(
But rest is all GREAT, thank GOD!!! :)
 
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Points
0
In the last part, I wrote SYSTEMATIC error! And i have a confusion! Were we supposed to take the errors as 1.0/12*100 and 0.1/5.6*100 or we should have halved the least graduation????
 
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
Points
0
for the part after the gradient one we had to multiply gradient wd 84 ( the Mr of NaHCO3)

and in the last part the one abt the enthalpy change we had to do
Q = m.c.(delta)T
and put 30 in plce ov m
4.3 in place ov c
and ans ov da part before ds part (which was cmin smthng near to 190 deg C) in place of (delta)T
the enthalpy was then cming near 25 kJ/mol

the mstake i did was to becme OVER-EFFICIENT
i took da mass wrong becz ov which my enthalpy is cming wrong
 
Top