• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Economics, Accounting & Business: Post your doubts here!

Messages
347
Reaction score
520
Points
73
Hi can anyone explain how to get the answer to this question

A country's TOT currently stands at 150 with base year 2000 =100
Since 2000, the average price the country has received for ita exports has increased by 20 %.
What has been the change in the average price it has paid for its imports.?

Thankksss
120/x * 100 = 150
x = 80
Means that imports reduced by 20%
 
Messages
553
Reaction score
1,080
Points
73
Equilibrium price is $2 because all have four clocks!
At $2 X's demand is 2 clocks while Z's demand is 6 clocks.
Because of that, X will sell his 2 clocks and Z will buy 2 clocks.
Thereby answer D.
Examiner report says this:
EyMuLD2.png

 
Messages
886
Reaction score
1,252
Points
153
Equilibrium price is $2 because all have four clocks!
At $2 X's demand is 2 clocks while Z's demand is 6 clocks.
Because of that, X will sell his 2 clocks and Z will buy 2 clocks.
Thereby answer D.
Examiner report says this:
EyMuLD2.png
how do we know the equilibrium price is $2 because all have four clocks ???
anyway jazakallah
 
Last edited:
Messages
347
Reaction score
520
Points
73
The secret to doing this MCQ is to know that this is the diagram of 'AFTER' the trade off has taken place.
If you observe closely, the equillibrium is $2 as I've highlighted in the diagram.
After the trade off, X has only 2 watches while Z has 6 watches. This means that X sold 2 watches to Z and Z bought 2 watches from X
Therefore answer is D
upload_2014-4-8_17-59-45.png
 
Messages
17
Reaction score
14
Points
13
Discuss why some governments decide that it is undesirable to leave the provision of private goods such as train travel, to the private sector.
Can you please help me with this this question.
Thanks in advance.
 
Messages
347
Reaction score
520
Points
73
Discuss why some governments decide that it is undesirable to leave the provision of private goods such as train travel, to the private sector.
Can you please help me with this this question.
Thanks in advance.
This one's easy.
You could start of by talking about the characteristics of private goods. Rival, exclude-able etc.
Then you could talk about why such private goods such as train travel might not be left to private sector, this could include market exploitation by the monopolist, and private sector focusing on profit maximization rather than working for public interest. You could draw a diagram of negative externality arising from production by private sector and how they seems to ignore the social cost.
Then you can tell how the government would have to intervene into the market and either impose taxes on the producer or nationalize the firm or an industry in order to stop market exploitation.
 
Messages
886
Reaction score
1,252
Points
153
The secret to doing this MCQ is to know that this is the diagram of 'AFTER' the trade off has taken place.
If you observe closely, the equillibrium is $2 as I've highlighted in the diagram.
After the trade off, X has only 2 watches while Z has 6 watches. This means that X sold 2 watches to Z and Z bought 2 watches from X
Therefore answer is D
View attachment 38616
how is the equilibrium 2 ...each of them have only 4 clocks ..therefore its supposed to be perfectly inelastic supply right? o_O
 
Messages
347
Reaction score
520
Points
73
how is the equilibrium 2 ...each of them have only 4 clocks ..therefore its supposed to be perfectly inelastic supply right? o_O
But they are trading between themselves, they initially have 4 clocks but it doesn't mean that they are reluctant to exchange between themselves. Also, we are currently more interested in the demand rather than supply so we'd assume that each of them would be ready to supply the clock at a given price level. We aren't looking for that because the diagram given is 'after' the exchange has been taken place. To determine the equllibrium price, we've only 3 options, $1 $2 or $3
If we observe $1 then the quantity of X Y and Z isn't equal to 12
X =4
Y =6
Z =9
But at price level $2, the quantity level is equal to 12
X = 2
Y = 4
Z = 6
again at price level $3, the quanitity level isn't equal, that's why $2 is the equillibrium price level.
 
Messages
886
Reaction score
1,252
Points
153
But they are trading between themselves, they initially have 4 clocks but it doesn't mean that they are reluctant to exchange between themselves. Also, we are currently more interested in the demand rather than supply so we'd assume that each of them would be ready to supply the clock at a given price level. We aren't looking for that because the diagram given is 'after' the exchange has been taken place. To determine the equllibrium price, we've only 3 options, $1 $2 or $3
If we observe $1 then the quantity of X Y and Z isn't equal to 12
X =4
Y =6
Z =9
But at price level $2, the quantity level is equal to 12
X = 2
Y = 4
Z = 6
again at price level $3, the quanitity level isn't equal, that's why $2 is the equillibrium price level.
Jazakallah bro ...got it at last .... :D :)
 
Top