- Messages
- 657
- Reaction score
- 1,447
- Points
- 143
Accuracy.But a normal one was given to us. Why alter the apparatus already given?
We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
Accuracy.But a normal one was given to us. Why alter the apparatus already given?
Accuracy.
Dont think calibrated one is right. You just cant change the whole apparatus like that. It has been told in Examiner Reports to not do that.How will the beaker be calibrated?
Also, it can be calibrated for volume, but for length?
So answers like using a calibrated beaker are being accepted but not the one i proposed. :/
Dont think calibrated one is right. You just cant change the whole apparatus like that. It has been told in Examiner Reports to not do that.
The rod? Was it a wooden rod or something else?
Some people said to take it out, and look at the water marks, and mark it, and then measure L.
What do you think of this method?
Doesnt seem correct aswell? If we could just take out the rod, then what's the problem? I think CIE has more to it than that
Good point. Who didn't accept your answer?How will the beaker be calibrated?
Also, it can be calibrated for volume, but for length?
So answers like using a calibrated beaker are being accepted but not the one i proposed. :/
Good point. Who didn't accept your answer?
Lets just pray that the examiners read it with a open mind.
people l gave the answers in SI units is it fine.....e.g the refraction question in which we had to measure lenghts??l did it because there were no units given in the question and my sir said if there were no units given then we have to take measurements in SL units?
God l am very worried.......
i wrote almost the same experiment i wrote to add some dye in water to make it colored, and dip the rod in gently, then measure the uncoloured length of rodFor question 1, part 2, I wrote that the rod is wrapped in cobalt chloride paper, that part that sinks becomes, pink, it is removed, measured with a ruler and wrote how to avoid parallex error. Is that correct?
Anyone?
i wrote the sameI wrote that keeps on floating vertivally so its difficult to measure its accurate length
I think that is correct ...Silly mistakes.
I wrote ammeters have different resistances. Is that right?
I think that is correct ...
so that weight of the lower end of increases with invariable intervals.WHY USE IDENTICAL RUBBERS?
i think, no. coz we have to make it parallel to the incident ray considering the glass-to-air refractive index.In q.3 last part if we made line l on estimation would we get marks??
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now