How did the physics 22 paper go?

[AbdullahBShakeel]

No my direction was wrong lel

 

[Aly Emran]

It IS a possibility ... just not applicable here B/

Hahahhaha ur idea was epic

Yeah but dont worry,like i said some use from calculators,some round off.If your idea is fully correct you wont lose marks.

Hmm yes what i did was like this: (2*7.66)-22.7=-7.38m .-.

 

[Amandaissocoollike]

I'm starting to think i got the entire kinematics question wrong

 

[asadalam]

Hahahhaha ur idea was epic

Hmm yes what i did was like this2*7.66)-22.7=-7.38m .-.

How did you get to that conclusion?I used distance travelled up-distance travelled down

7.66-15.0=-7.33

- so ans i opposite direction i.e downwards.

 

[AbdullahBShakeel]

So i get 2 out of 11.. Damn..

 

[awesomaholic101]

Hahahhaha ur idea was epic

Hmm yes what i did was like this2*7.66)-22.7=-7.38m .-.

Thanx B-)
Oh gosh! Now I remember ... I got all those displacement answers rite but while writing final answer I took off the -ve sign stupid me!

 

[Aly Emran]

How did you get to that conclusion?I used distance travelled up-distance travelled down

7.66-15.0=-7.33

- so ans i opposite direction i.e downwards.

What i did was: total distance- distance travelled up and down of EQUAL height to get the remaining height....
For example: if distance moved up and down were equal, both will cancel each other and give 0 but the extra distance travelled down will be found.

I calculated urs too... We did the same thing. The only difference is that i wrote 22.7 instead of its accurate value thats it.

 

[asadalam]

What i did was: total distance- distance travelled up and down of EQUAL height to get the remaining height....
For example: if distance moved up and down were equal, both will cancel each other and give 0 but the extra distance travelled down will be found

Im not quite getting it though,How does that give the extra distance?

 

[Aly Emran]

Im not quite getting it though,How does that give the extra distance?

Total distance- upper part of the displacement time graph... The whole semi circle(if its a semi circle)... This will give us the negative portion of the graph

 

[asadalam]

Total distance- upper part of the displacement time graph... The whole semi circle(if its a semi circle)... This will give us the negative portion of the graph

Its not a circle its a parabola,similar to ta graph of x^2
But total distance minus uppar part distance will give 22.7-7.66=15m

 

[farhan141]

Guys just leave discussing .

Prepare hard for MCQs

 

[Aly Emran]

Its not a circle its a parabola,similar to ta graph of x^2
But total distance minus uppar part distance will give 22.7-7.66=15m

-_________- w8 lemme show u an evidence:
I hope now u understand what I did :/ (plz say i did it correctly :/)

 

[asadalam]

Guys just leave discussing .

Prepare hard for MCQs

MCQs ko to abhi mahina para hai yar

 

[asadalam]

-_________- w8 lemme show u as evidence:
I hope now u understand what I did :/ (plz say i did correctly :/)

Yeah it seems logical to me.

 

[Aly Emran]

Yeah it seems logical to me.

FINALLLY!!!!!!! Now I can die in peace >.>

 

[awesomaholic101]

T

Yeah it seems logical to me.

T means ur wrong now??

 

[asadalam]

T

T means ur wrong now??

Its just a different approach
1+1=2 but 0+2=2 also.That doesnt mean either of them is 'wrong' or 'right'
Its perfectly logical hence its right

 

[awesomaholic101]

Its just a different approach
1+1=2 but 0+2=2 also.That doesnt mean either of them is 'wrong' or 'right'
Its perfectly logical hence its right

Kaay so both methods r giving same answer ... sorry lol

 

[hamzashariq]

-_________- w8 lemme show u an evidence:
I hope now u understand what I did :/ (plz say i did it correctly :/)

Total distance travelled is A + B. The total displacement however, is B.

 

[iwillrise]

Guys how did you find the electricity question? Did anyone else get 4500 ohms as the resistance value?