- Messages
- 249
- Reaction score
- 90
- Points
- 38
x is 5!!!
We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
thr is alwys a chance whr u wil gt marks in othr pts! n i gues da gt wil b lyk 18-19.. ecf is thr!In paper 52 i got X as 4.6 but rouneded it off to 4 insead of 5 stupid mistakes ...
QUESTION : q1 ws just simple titration to find concentration of 1g/cm^3 at 25*C only right .....i mean the whole thing ws just explaining titration not related much to solubility ?x is 5!!!
for 1 point i wrote the CuSO4 ws blown off when measuring its final mass....nd for the second point with too many moles of H2O i wrote constant mass wsnt achieved !I calculated the gradient wrong on my calculator for p52 and got 2.67, and rounded it to 3, but my reasoning is ok, how many marks will that get me? Also, is "Mass of the CuSO4 (or w/e it was) wasn't measured correctly" a valid reason for one of the anomalies?
ya! i ws so hapy to see the solubilty prt bt my heart sank once i saw the titration qustn fr 8 mrks!!! time was a big hurdle, esp wit that qustn!QUESTION : q1 ws just simple titration to find concentration of 1g/cm^3 at 25*C only right .....i mean the whole thing ws just explaining titration not related much to solubility ?
i think titration ws a better exp since we do that all the time in p3,,,,,conc. of ws 0.013 mol/dm3,,,,,,what do u think ?wat was the conc of Cu(OH)2
i had compltly frgttn everythng abt titration coz i did my AS last yr!! my cocn ws nt even close to 0.013!i think titration ws a better exp since we do that all the time in p3,,,,,conc. of ws 0.013 mol/dm3,,,,,,what do u think ?
it was in question 2, you had to find the moles of water formed and then plot the graph with anhydrous Fe2SO4 on the x axis and moles of water on Y axis..... :/
most of my friends who did that had only 15 mins to solve the Q1 which required thinking and strategy
i think titration ws a better exp since we do that all the time in p3,,,,,conc. of ws 0.013 mol/dm3,,,,,,what do u think ?
For moles of water being too low. Not all of the water was evaporated. For moles of water being too high, some solid was blown out of tube.for 1 point i wrote the CuSO4 ws blown off when measuring its final mass....nd for the second point with too many moles of H2O i wrote constant mass wsnt achieved !
i was like jumping from the inside watching the solubility question and then i saw TITRATION!.. phewwwwwwwya! i ws so hapy to see the solubilty prt bt my heart sank once i saw the titration qustn fr 8 mrks!!! time was a big hurdle, esp wit that qustn!
:S i dont really remember i wrote what for what ....dang i hope i get it rite !!!!For moles of water being too low. Not all of the water was evaporated. For moles of water being too high, some solid was blown out of tube.
what you answerd your last question?Paper 22 went good :O guys are you serious? Time was so less ! Messed up in hury !
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now