• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Mathematics: Post your doubts here!

Messages
3,401
Reaction score
9,793
Points
523
View attachment 58958
Parts ii and iii please
I cant recall any other method. Maybe ***amd*** can help.
I guess you just need to rearrange
a sin(a) + cos(a) = 1.5
and prove by induction that when a = 1, left-hand-side expression equals 1.38, and when a = 1/2 pi, left-hand-side expression equals 1.57.
As the value of LHS is increasing from a=1 to a=0.5pi, the value of 'a' for which LHS = 1.5 must lie b/w 1 and 0.5pi. 'a' is then greater than 1.
since the graph of 'a sina + cos a' against 'a' is going to be a wavy kinda one, you jest prove that the part of it which lies between a=1 and a=0.5pi is increasing with value of LHS = 1.5 inside it.
http://fooplot.com/#W3sidHlwZSI6MCw...3MDQ5OTk0NiIsIjE0Ljk4NzMyNjk1NDQ5OTk1Il19XQ-- just zoom out and check out the shape of graph *_*

P.S. you should consult examiner report of mark scheme, I am not sure if my method is right or not. This should be acceptable though.
 
Messages
1,318
Reaction score
1,374
Points
173
upload_2016-1-27_17-36-56.png
Can anyone please solve to find values of A,B and C in these partial fractions ??

[A/(x+1)] + [B/(x+2)] + [C/(4x+3)] = the part ii shown above
So how to find A,B and C?? I can do it with 2 denominators... with the 3 I'm getting it wrong :/
w15-33
 
Messages
455
Reaction score
7,676
Points
503
View attachment 58988
Can anyone please solve to find values of A,B and C in these partial fractions ??

[A/(x+1)] + [B/(x+2)] + [C/(4x+3)] = the part ii shown above
So how to find A,B and C?? I can do it with 2 denominators... with the 3 I'm getting it wrong :/
w15-33
If your factorization is correct then you should get the correct answers. Take x as -1 then -3/4 and then -2
 
Messages
1,318
Reaction score
1,374
Points
173
upload_2016-1-27_17-21-5-png.58987

how to solve?? :p
 
Messages
1,318
Reaction score
1,374
Points
173
If your factorization is correct then you should get the correct answers. Take x as -1 then -3/4 and then -2
So do you take x=-1 on both sides and then solve like so: A(x+2)(4x+3) + B(x+1)(4x+3) + C(x+1)(x+2) so that B and C terms become 0 when x=-1 ??
 
Messages
1,824
Reaction score
5,326
Points
523
Can anyone tell me as to why the speed in part (iii) would not exceed 20? (The method used to calculate this 20 is assuming a=0............. which is when there is max speed.......... so how is it the least value?)
Capture.PNG
Thnx :D
 
Messages
924
Reaction score
1,096
Points
153
Can anyone tell me as to why the speed in part (iii) would not exceed 20? (The method used to calculate this 20 is assuming a=0............. which is when there is max speed.......... so how is it the least value?)
View attachment 59004
Thnx :D
I haven't read the question in detail, but one thing you say has caught my attention.

Acceleration being zero doesn't mean maximum speed, it could mean either max OR minimum speed.

It's just like the derivative of a function. When it's zero, it represents a total maxima OR minima of the original function. To find out which one it is (Max or Min) you have to do the sign changing test or evaluate the Second Derivative and see it it's greater than or less than zero.

Hope that makes sense.
 
Messages
1,394
Reaction score
12,123
Points
523
Can anyone tell me as to why the speed in part (iii) would not exceed 20? (The method used to calculate this 20 is assuming a=0............. which is when there is max speed.......... so how is it the least value?)
View attachment 59004
Thnx :D

(ii) F = P/V

F ~ 1/V

Since the power is constant, the force is inversely proportional to V. In this situation, the acceleration will only be zero when the forward force will be equal to the resistive force. So in order to achieve this, the forward force must increase. As this will happen, the velocity of the car will decrease; therefore the velocity won't be a maximum when a=0 in this situation. Thus, this value of v is a minimum value here.
 
Messages
1,824
Reaction score
5,326
Points
523
I haven't read the question in detail, but one thing you say has caught my attention.

Acceleration being zero doesn't mean maximum speed, it could mean either max OR minimum speed.

It's just like the derivative of a function. When it's zero, it represents a total maxima OR minima of the original function. To find out which one it is (Max or Min) you have to do the sign changing test or evaluate the Second Derivative and see it it's greater than or less than zero.

Hope that makes sense.
Ohhhhhh, Ohkayyyyyy!
Yup that makes sense, though I haven't studied the last part :D
 
Messages
1,824
Reaction score
5,326
Points
523
(ii) F = P/V

F ~ 1/V

Since the power is constant, the force is inversely proportional to V. In this situation, the acceleration will only be zero when the forward force will be equal to the resistive force. So in order to achieve this, the forward force must increase. As this will happen, the velocity of the car will decrease; therefore the velocity won't be a maximum when a=0 in this situation. Thus, this value of v is a minimum value here.
Oooooh okay, ryt!
Thnx!!!! :D
 
Top