- Messages
- 690
- Reaction score
- 321
- Points
- 73
Dudes, the parallel sides were 25 and 15, and the area was 248, now find the height for yourself, it will be 12.4
We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
it was a paralelogram not a trapeziumcan u remind me f da area n da side f da trapezium whch was given in Q8 mensuration(whch were given in qs)
which question u guys talking about?! in paper 2?? in section A? there was no trapezium in the paper. there were 2 paralelogramsnot sure but as far as i remember !! sides were 25 and 15...area given was 248 !! not sure !!! my height was 12.4 cm not sure if i remeber it properly !!
no it was 4. it's not enlargement. If it's enlargement, then it's the square root of it. But then, this is stretchScale factor was 2. right?
3k^2=12
k^2=4
k=2
no it was 4. it's not enlargement. If it's enlargement, then it's the square root of it. But then, this is stretch
Yep, It wasn't 2, it was 4, and the points were 1,4Scale factor was 2. right?
3k^2=12
k^2=4
k=2
can you pleeeease tell me which question u guys are talking about? please?Dudes, the parallel sides were 25 and 15, and the area was 248, now find the height for yourself, it will be 12.4
2:3wat was da ratio f last parts f vectors qs
my ratio came 0.4:0.6
my ratio came 0.4:0.6
is it necessary to simplify or will i get full marks at 0.4:0.6(bcz qs didnt asked us to simplify)
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now