We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
You got 8m for the first 8 seconds. but when applying limits for the second half you were supposed to take (27-8) = 19 seconds and 0 as the limits because the object travelled in that motion for only 19 sec not 27 seconds completely.
Okay dude, that is literally the most retarded thing I have heard. You cant just subtract time and then make it into limits. Haven't you solved past papers or anything? It was 71.3
-6FU CK YEAH ! ,
EVeryone answer correct
what was the answer of last question last part
i found it as -10 but i am sure i am wrong
Mr.Genius you CAN'T use the limits 0 and 19. ahahahahahahah!
exactly so the answer was 71.3 . End of story
I am gonna pretend that you people never attempted past papers -_-. Who the hell ever heard of subtracting time like that and then substituting it into limits -_-
Yeah okay but the answer was still 71.3. They are two ways of doing hte question. You could integrate the expression to get an equation for distance and find the value of the constant and use that to find the distance travelled. STIL YOU GET 71.3
Well i probably solved papers right from the year you were born all the way to Nov 13. Even I got 71.3 but I realize that its wrong because on the same thread a few pages before this one there is a legit explanation to that. But if 71.3 is right I'll be happier.
Firstly I was born in 1996. Secondly, the answer was 71.3Well i probably solved papers right from the year you were born all the way to Nov 13. Even I got 71.3 but I realize that its wrong because on the same thread a few pages before this one there is a legit explanation to that. But if 71.3 is right I'll be happier.
Well i probably solved papers right from the year you were born all the way to Nov 13. Even I got 71.3 but I realize that its wrong because on the same thread a few pages before this one there is a legit explanation to that. But if 71.3 is right I'll be happier.
Have you never come across a quesiton like this in past papers? There are more than 11 questions like this. All of them, I have checked. The answer is 71.3. END OF STORY.
So I solved a year before you were born to be precise. And the answer is 40. something. Its a simple concept. I still don't understand how are you not able grasp it?
That is right. That explanation does not apply in any case.
Okay first of all. I have a pretty good memory. This means that I can remember numbers very easily and the answer was 71.3. if you want I'll upload a solution
Ok guys, lets wait till august. Then we'll find out who's wrong and who's right
Well did you ever come across any question like Q7 from our paper. We've never had 3 particles as far as I remember. if the answer is 71.3 i'll be getting a few marks more. And I'm not trying to fight here sorry If I sounded rude tho.
I haev 7 people waiting in line ready to testify that the answer is correct.Ok guys, lets wait till august. Then we'll find out who's wrong and who's right
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now